[simple simon]

Suspended NFL player Adam "Pacman" Jones was being sought by police for questioning about a shooting early Monday involving members of his entourage after a fight at an Atlanta strip club.

Jones, a cornerback for the Tennessee Titans on suspension following a melee and shooting at a Las Vegas strip club, his group and three other people got into a fight, apparently over a woman, at a club around 4 a.m., officer Ariel Toledo said.

After everyone involved left the strip club - the three people in one car, and Jones and his entourage in three other cars - someone in Jones' group shot at the car, and the others returned fire, Toledo said.


Toledo said Jones was not present when the shots were fired.
"We believe he knows some of his entourage who were involved in the shooting," Toledo said. "On himself, we do not have any charges on him. He wasn't there when the shooting occurred."


One person who was outside the vehicles and not involved in the dispute was injured by debris in the shooting and was treated by emergency medical technicians, Toledo said.

FOX Sports on MSN - NFL - Police want to talk to "Pacman" after shootout

[simple simon]

looks like Same "Crap" Different Day for Pacman

so much for his self imposed rule to stay away from strip clubs

[Gotham Dark Knight]

Yeah...but why is it news? Why does, "police want to talk to Pacman again" is so freakin news worthy? I rather debate an article on Pac's replacement.

[azrael492]

So much for his hope for a midseason lift of his suspension. He was supposed to stay out of these situations. I would get a new 'entourage'.

[alex83]

yeah but once again this is just another situation of Pacman was in the same state lets blame him. its interesting how in this whole ordeal they mention Pacman and his entourage were in 3 different cars and also the fact that at no point is Pacman's name mentioned as being a shooter or being part of the shooting, are people seriously saying he should be blamed if a memeber of his entourage took it upon themselves to start shooting people? or is this just going to be a case of 'coincidence'? its Pacman? etc etc...? find me evidence to prove the case and then things can be blamed on Pacman, until then leave the guy alone.

i mean people are still holding on to this Vegas thing and months and months later they are yet to charge Pacman becuase they are yet to find a single shred of evidence from the crime scene or get any video tapes or anything

[Gotham Dark Knight]

Perhaps Pacman just needs to change his name...then he would be free of the media...

[Lefty Noob]

Originally Posted by Gotham Dark Knight

Perhaps Pacman just needs to change his name...then he would be free of the media...

There you go. He could change it to Donkey Kong Smith. Then he'd be all set!

[ThePundit]

It's a good thing Pacman was turning over a new leaf, huh?

If he was serious about what he said, he shouldn't be out at clubs, at all!

[Gotham Dark Knight]

Originally Posted by Lefty Noob

There you go. He could change it to Donkey Kong Smith. Then he'd be all set!

See, that's all I am saying...it would take the media months to figure it out!

[alex83]

lol come on, are you saying that for the rest of his life he shouldnt go to clubs beacuse he said hes going to be sensible? in that case hes not allowed to go anywhere near a store that sells guns just incase he is accused of being involved in a drive by, he cannot enter a store that sells alcohol incase he is arrested for being drunk and disordely...

this is just a prefect example of people jumping to a conclusion about him, everyone assumed he was the main culprite in the vegas shooting and yet there has not been a single piece of evidence to support it, now the police want to TALK to Pac about this latest incident and automitically he has done something wrong beucase he was at a club, ease up on the guy and let him be charged if evidence proves he is guilty, dont get the handcuffs and chains ready becuase he was somewhere where there was violence

[Gotham Dark Knight]

Originally Posted by alex83

lol come on, are you saying that for the rest of his life he shouldnt go to clubs beacuse he said hes going to be sensible? in that case hes not allowed to go anywhere near a store that sells guns just incase he is accused of being involved in a drive by, he cannot enter a store that sells alcohol incase he is arrested for being drunk and disordely...

this is just a prefect example of people jumping to a conclusion about him, everyone assumed he was the main culprite in the vegas shooting and yet there has not been a single piece of evidence to support it, now the police want to TALK to Pac about this latest incident and automitically he has done something wrong beucase he was at a club, ease up on the guy and let him be charged if evidence proves he is guilty, dont get the handcuffs and chains ready becuase he was somewhere where there was violence

No, but with career at stake and the media on him, it would have been wise for him to steer clear of areas where their might be such an altercation...

[alex83]

but saying that surely everywhere you go there is a chance of being involved in an altercation? of course some places are more likely for it to happen than others but if he is in the supermarket getting food and he pushes past someone, then that person can go to the media and claim he assaulted them...the problem is that no matter what he does if dangerous activity is in his vacinity he will be accused of being involved in it so regardless of if he was driving home from a club or in the park with his daughter he should be arrested and charged for crimes it has been proven he commited...not just assuming and jumping to conclusions everytime he is near something bad that happens, do we live in a society where people are judged by their pasts and for the that MUST have commited a crime that are said to have been involved in or do we live in a democracy where a person is innocent until proven guilty?

[Gotham Dark Knight]

Originally Posted by alex83

but saying that surely everywhere you go there is a chance of being involved in an altercation? of course some places are more likely for it to happen than others but if he is in the supermarket getting food and he pushes past someone, then that person can go to the media and claim he assaulted them...the problem is that no matter what he does if dangerous activity is in his vacinity he will be accused of being involved in it so regardless of if he was driving home from a club or in the park with his daughter he should be arrested and charged for crimes it has been proven he commited...not just assuming and jumping to conclusions everytime he is near something bad that happens, do we live in a society where people are judged by their pasts and for the that MUST have commited a crime that are said to have been involved in or do we live in a democracy where a person is innocent until proven guilty?

True or False?
Church on Sunday less of a chance than Strip Club at 4:00 AM...

The guy has an image problem...and he is not doing the right things to clean it up...if he was, he would not be a media lightening rod...has nothing to do with guilty or not guilty...the smart man would clean his image if he wants to keep the career...

[alex83]

yes but later on i said "obviously there are more places where you are likely to get involved in an alteration than others"

and like i said no matter what he does anymore he is likely to be focused on if he is in the vasinity of trouble so its not about him cleaning up his act becuase like in the case of the most recent event for all we know he went to a club, had an orange juice and sat in the corner quietly...but becuase someone in his ENTOURAGE shot at someone HE is the worst person in the world and needs to clean up his act.

[Gotham Dark Knight]

Originally Posted by alex83

yes but later on i said "obviously there are more places where you are likely to get involved in an alteration than others"

and like i said no matter what he does anymore he is likely to be focused on if he is in the vasinity of trouble so its not about him cleaning up his act becuase like in the case of the most recent event for all we know he went to a club, had an orange juice and sat in the corner quietly...but becuase someone in his ENTOURAGE shot at someone HE is the worst person in the world and needs to clean up his act.

No but it does say he is one heck of a dumb one when it comes to picking friends...if I had friends that were hell bent on destroying my career by their actions...they would no longer be my friends...Pacman Jones is one heck of a dumb guy in my book...and as such deserves in part the "bad rap" he is getting.