![]() |
|
| |||||||
| |
| Sprint Cup Forum NASCAR Forum. ShortTrack to SuperSpeedway, come trade some paint with other race fans. Talk about everything that's NASCAR racing in our NASCAR Forum. |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center #48 and #5 cars 'too close' in tolerances at R&D center? UPDATE: Claire B. Lang reported on Sirius Satellite NASCAR Radio Channel 128 "Dialed In" show Thursday night that the #48 and #5 Chevy's teams of Hendrick Motorsports were told they cars were too close to NASCAR tolerances at the NASCAR R&D Center in Concord, NC this week. The cars were taken to the R&D Center after Jimmie Johnson won the Sprint Cup race at Dover in the #48 with Mark Martin finishing 2nd in the #5 Chevy. Lang says she heard the teams were told not to bring the cars back to the track. Lang asked NASCAR if this was true and was told: "The 48 and 5 were brought back to the R&D center. We've been doing this since the inception of the new car as a part of routine post-race inspection. We bring the winner and a random pick back to the R&D center after each event. While both cars passed post race inspection, we informed the 48 and 5 they were extremely close on some of the tolerances."(10-1-2009) UPDATE Word circulated Wednesday night that NASCAR had found issues with the #48 Chevy as well as the #5 Chevy during inspection at the Research and Development Center in Concord, N.C. The two Hendrick Motorsports teams currently sit atop the points standings. The buzz within the NASCAR community suggests that the offset on the tail, which helps the rear of the car stick to the ground instead of spinning out, of the #5 Kellogg's Chevy just made the tolerance. NASCAR allows a tolerance of 0.070 of an inch for the body off of the center line of the car. Suffice it to say, JJ's #48 car didn't make it. But by how much? NASCAR claims it was .006 over the tolerance. That's about the thickness of two sheets of copier paper. Others in the garage hint at a charitable disposition on the part of the sanctioning body. So how did NASCAR view the situation with the Hendrick cars? "The 48 and 5 were brought back to the (Research and Development Center)," according to a NASCAR statement. "We've been doing this since the inception of the new car as a part of routine post-race inspection. We bring the winner and a random pick back to the R&D Center after each event. While both cars passed postrace inspection, we informed the 48 and 5 they were extremely close on some of the tolerances."(in part from FoxSports)(10-2-2009) CHEATER HENDRICKS!! Nothing new!! |
| ||||
| Re: #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center Quote:
They ought to be banished from the sport. If I had kids I certainly wouldn't want them to "look up" to them as "heroes", or to see the message that I see: it's ok to cheat!! In my opinion, I don't think that somebody who is cheating should be the champion in any sport or business. But then maybe that is why I am an ordinary, average Joe with an ordinary average job. I can't stand Hendricks teams or their cheating ways!! As far as I'm concerned that is another reason why their T.V. ratings are down and seats aren't full. |
| |||
| Re: #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center Quote:
Carl Long's engine was to big by how much? I've forgotten, but they said it wasn't enough to make a difference and look what they did to him.
__________________ Family reunions really make you appreciate the other 51 weeks more. |
| ||||
| Re: #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center Quote:
|
| |||
| Re: #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center I appreciate that the teams are going as far as they can in terms of tolerances. What I don't understand is that JJ passed post race inspection yet at the R&D center he was six one thousands out. So, did the wing move after postrace? Could it have come from pushing it into the hauler? I agree that if it is over he needs to be penalized. The usual 10 grand and 150 points 'actions detrimental to the sport' blah blah blah. Let's see Pemberton spin this one so that NASCAR doesn't look bad. |
| ||||
| Re: #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center Quote:
NASCAR allows a tolerance of 0.070 of an inch for the body off of the center line of the car. Suffice it to say, JJ's #48 car didn't make it.
__________________ I'm waiting to see that checkered flag and then I'll hollar -----" Richard Childress" |
| |||
| Re: #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center When will we find out if/when the 48 team will get a penalty, and if they do, will we still find out on Tuesday? Or are they already off the hook with a warning? |
| ||||
| Re: #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center Quote:
The two Chevrolets owned by Hendrick Motorsports came within less than an inch of surpassing the tolerated measurements on the body of their cars. Martin is currently leading the Sprint Cup Series point points, and three-time defending series champion Johnson is second. The crew chiefs for both drivers say they weren't cheating, and in-race damage may have caused the cars to creep toward the maximum allowances. NASCAR is not penalizing either team, but they have been warned. NASCAR.COM - Martin, Johnson teams get warning after inspections - Oct 2, 2009 As Jethro Tull once sang, "Skating away on the thin ice of a new day" |
| Sponsored Links |
| ||||
| Re: #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center Phils, that doesn't apply to Hendricks!! Check out this link: Jimmie Johnson and Chad Knaus Are Up to It Again | Bleacher Report Two stories!! |
| ||||
| Re: #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center Thanks for sharing those. I didn't give it much thought when I walked by the car in the still and saw it covered. I did see them putting the template on it, but again, nothing odd seemed to be happening. |
| |||
| Re: #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center Here's another perspective from lee Spencer at NA__AR on FOX. It says, in part: NASCAR allows a tolerance of 0.070 of an inch for the body off of the center line of the car. Suffice it to say, it appears Knaus pushed the limits again. But by how much? NASCAR claims it was .006 over the tolerance. That's about the thickness of two sheets of copier paper. Others in the garage hint at a charitable disposition on the part of the sanctioning body. "You can get through inspection with quite a lot," said a crew chief who spoke on the condition of anonymity. "You can skew the grid. Back at the tech center is a whole different deal. You're busted. There's no way around it. So you just don't do it. It just seems weird that two cars from Hendrick Motorsports were questionable. If it had been me, I would have been suspended for six weeks." But Knaus escapes with a warning. The whole things is at: Hendrick avoids penalty despite inspection issue - NASCAR News - FOX Sports on MSN I guess with every five or ten wins Hendrick gets another "Get Out of Jail Card?"
__________________ "If we can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people, under the pretence of taking care of them, they must become happy." -THOMAS JEFFERSON 6 days until R&R in Key West |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:30 PM.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||