GoTeamsGo Sports Fan Forum Photobucket  

Go Back   GoTeamsGo Sports Fan Forum > NASCAR Forums > Sprint Cup Forum
User Name
Password Register
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Sprint Cup Forum NASCAR Forum. ShortTrack to SuperSpeedway, come trade some paint with other race fans. Talk about everything that's NASCAR racing in our NASCAR Forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2009, 06:02 AM
Team Yates's Avatar
Team Yates Team Yates is offline
NASCAR/Motorsports Super Moderator
VIP Member BadgeCharter Member BadgeStaff Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lancaster, Pa
Posts: 4,087
Team Yates is an unknown quantity at this point
#48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center

#48 and #5 cars 'too close' in tolerances at R&D center? UPDATE: Claire B. Lang reported on Sirius Satellite NASCAR Radio Channel 128 "Dialed In" show Thursday night that the #48 and #5 Chevy's teams of Hendrick Motorsports were told they cars were too close to NASCAR tolerances at the NASCAR R&D Center in Concord, NC this week. The cars were taken to the R&D Center after Jimmie Johnson won the Sprint Cup race at Dover in the #48 with Mark Martin finishing 2nd in the #5 Chevy. Lang says she heard the teams were told not to bring the cars back to the track. Lang asked NASCAR if this was true and was told: "The 48 and 5 were brought back to the R&D center. We've been doing this since the inception of the new car as a part of routine post-race inspection. We bring the winner and a random pick back to the R&D center after each event. While both cars passed post race inspection, we informed the 48 and 5 they were extremely close on some of the tolerances."(10-1-2009)
UPDATE Word circulated Wednesday night that NASCAR had found issues with the #48 Chevy as well as the #5 Chevy during inspection at the Research and Development Center in Concord, N.C. The two Hendrick Motorsports teams currently sit atop the points standings. The buzz within the NASCAR community suggests that the offset on the tail, which helps the rear of the car stick to the ground instead of spinning out, of the #5 Kellogg's Chevy just made the tolerance. NASCAR allows a tolerance of 0.070 of an inch for the body off of the center line of the car. Suffice it to say, JJ's #48 car didn't make it. But by how much? NASCAR claims it was .006 over the tolerance. That's about the thickness of two sheets of copier paper. Others in the garage hint at a charitable disposition on the part of the sanctioning body. So how did NASCAR view the situation with the Hendrick cars? "The 48 and 5 were brought back to the (Research and Development Center)," according to a NASCAR statement. "We've been doing this since the inception of the new car as a part of routine post-race inspection. We bring the winner and a random pick back to the R&D Center after each event. While both cars passed postrace inspection, we informed the 48 and 5 they were extremely close on some of the tolerances."(in part from FoxSports)(10-2-2009)

CHEATER HENDRICKS!! Nothing new!!
__________________
YATES RACING- NEVER GIVE UP!!
GoTeamsGo Forum Rules
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2009, 06:08 AM
Quality88's Avatar
Quality88 Quality88 is offline
Super Senior Member
VIP Member BadgeCharter Member Badge
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 12,041
Quality88 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center

Okay Marks made it, just barely, but it made it and it was legal. JJ's didn't, regardless of how much it didn't it wasn't legal.

Any takers that if it wasn't JJ's car, say maybe Kahnes or Busch's, NA$CAR would be handing down atleast 150 point deduction by this point.
__________________
I may not defend the president, but I will always defend and support those that wear the uniform to defend my freedom and liberty

"SCREW POINTS RACIN!" - Q
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2009, 06:37 AM
HendrickMoto HendrickMoto is offline
Practice Squad
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 51
HendrickMoto is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center

You just have to love what Cheatin' Chad can pull. Any ideas on what (if any) punishment towards the 48 can come out of this?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2009, 07:23 AM
Team Yates's Avatar
Team Yates Team Yates is offline
NASCAR/Motorsports Super Moderator
VIP Member BadgeCharter Member BadgeStaff Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lancaster, Pa
Posts: 4,087
Team Yates is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quality88 View Post
Okay Marks made it, just barely, but it made it and it was legal. JJ's didn't, regardless of how much it didn't it wasn't legal.

Any takers that if it wasn't JJ's car, say maybe Kahnes or Busch's, NA$CAR would be handing down at least 150 point deduction by this point.
I agree with you 10,000%, best case in point would be what they did to Carl Long!!


Quote:
Originally Posted by HendrickMoto View Post
You just have to love what Cheatin' Chad can pull. Any ideas on what (if any) punishment towards the 48 can come out of this?
They ought to be banished from the sport. If I had kids I certainly wouldn't want them to "look up" to them as "heroes", or to see the message that I see: it's ok to cheat!! In my opinion, I don't think that somebody who is cheating should be the champion in any sport or business. But then maybe that is why I am an ordinary, average Joe with an ordinary average job. I can't stand Hendricks teams or their cheating ways!! As far as I'm concerned that is another reason why their T.V. ratings are down and seats aren't full.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2009, 07:26 AM
jks812 jks812 is offline
NASCAR CW Truck Series Moderator
VIP Member BadgeStaff Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,265
jks812 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quality88 View Post
Okay Marks made it, just barely, but it made it and it was legal. JJ's didn't, regardless of how much it didn't it wasn't legal.

Any takers that if it wasn't JJ's car, say maybe Kahnes or Busch's, NA$CAR would be handing down atleast 150 point deduction by this point.
Yes they would. Even though Mark's made it, if his had been Kahne's or Busch's they would probably have been penalized.
Carl Long's engine was to big by how much? I've forgotten, but they said it wasn't enough to make a difference and look what they did to him.
__________________
Family reunions really make you appreciate the other 51 weeks more.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2009, 09:26 AM
Robertdjr's Avatar
Robertdjr Robertdjr is offline
NASCAR Sprint Cup Moderator
Staff Badge
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 2,366
Robertdjr will become famous soon enough
Re: #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center

Quote:
Originally Posted by Team Yates View Post
They ought to be banished from the sport. If I had kids I certainly wouldn't want them to "look up" to them as "heroes", or to see the message that I see: it's ok to cheat!! In my opinion, I don't think that somebody who is cheating should be the champion in any sport or business. But then maybe that is why I am an ordinary, average Joe with an ordinary average job. I can't stand Hendricks teams or their cheating ways!! As far as I'm concerned that is another reason why their T.V. ratings are down and seats aren't full.
Apparently, the force of the Dark Side is still as strong as ever
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2009, 10:10 AM
Lefturn Lefturn is offline
Special Teams
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 272
Lefturn is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center

I appreciate that the teams are going as far as they can in terms of tolerances. What I don't understand is that JJ passed post race inspection yet at the R&D center he was six one thousands out. So, did the wing move after postrace? Could it have come from pushing it into the hauler?

I agree that if it is over he needs to be penalized. The usual 10 grand and 150 points 'actions detrimental to the sport' blah blah blah.

Let's see Pemberton spin this one so that NASCAR doesn't look bad.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2009, 10:36 AM
mike honcho's Avatar
mike honcho mike honcho is online now
Magic Man
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,534
mike honcho is on a distinguished road
Re: #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lefturn View Post
So, did the wing move after postrace? Could it have come from pushing it into the hauler?
I don't think it was just the wing.Sounds like the whole back half the car was off.

NASCAR allows a tolerance of 0.070 of an inch for the body off of the center line of the car. Suffice it to say, JJ's #48 car didn't make it.
__________________
I'm waiting to see that checkered flag and then I'll hollar -----" Richard Childress"
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2009, 11:52 AM
HendrickMoto HendrickMoto is offline
Practice Squad
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 51
HendrickMoto is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center

When will we find out if/when the 48 team will get a penalty, and if they do, will we still find out on Tuesday? Or are they already off the hook with a warning?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2009, 12:26 PM
Robertdjr's Avatar
Robertdjr Robertdjr is offline
NASCAR Sprint Cup Moderator
Staff Badge
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 2,366
Robertdjr will become famous soon enough
Re: #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center

Quote:
Originally Posted by HendrickMoto View Post
When will we find out if/when the 48 team will get a penalty, and if they do, will we still find out on Tuesday? Or are they already off the hook with a warning?
KANSAS CITY, Kan. -- NASCAR has warned Hendrick Motorsports that the cars of Jimmie Johnson and Mark Martin came very close to failing post-race inspection following their 1-2 finish at Dover last week.

The two Chevrolets owned by Hendrick Motorsports came within less than an inch of surpassing the tolerated measurements on the body of their cars. Martin is currently leading the Sprint Cup Series point points, and three-time defending series champion Johnson is second.

The crew chiefs for both drivers say they weren't cheating, and in-race damage may have caused the cars to creep toward the maximum allowances.

NASCAR is not penalizing either team, but they have been warned.

NASCAR.COM - Martin, Johnson teams get warning after inspections - Oct 2, 2009


As Jethro Tull once sang, "Skating away on the thin ice of a new day"
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2009, 12:43 PM
mike honcho's Avatar
mike honcho mike honcho is online now
Magic Man
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,534
mike honcho is on a distinguished road
Re: #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center

That's BULL they report the 48 failed now he just gets a warning.Stick me with a fork I'm done.I'll still watch but only when nothing else is on.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2009, 12:43 PM
Phils20's Avatar
Phils20 Phils20 is offline
Moderator
VIP Member BadgeStaff Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Smyrna, DE
Posts: 5,231
Phils20 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center

Wow, warned! What happened to "zero Tolerance". What a joke...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2009, 01:36 PM
Team Yates's Avatar
Team Yates Team Yates is offline
NASCAR/Motorsports Super Moderator
VIP Member BadgeCharter Member BadgeStaff Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lancaster, Pa
Posts: 4,087
Team Yates is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phils20 View Post
Wow, warned! What happened to "zero Tolerance". What a joke...
Phils, that doesn't apply to Hendricks!!


Check out this link:
Jimmie Johnson and Chad Knaus Are Up to It Again | Bleacher Report

Two stories!!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2009, 01:39 PM
Phils20's Avatar
Phils20 Phils20 is offline
Moderator
VIP Member BadgeStaff Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Smyrna, DE
Posts: 5,231
Phils20 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center

Thanks for sharing those. I didn't give it much thought when I walked by the car in the still and saw it covered. I did see them putting the template on it, but again, nothing odd seemed to be happening.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2009, 03:04 PM
Bob Tanner Bob Tanner is online now
Official F1 Moderator, Motorsports Curmudgeon and All Around Good Guy
VIP Member BadgeStaff Badge
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 9,735
Bob Tanner is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: #48 & #5 cars "to close" in tolerances @ R&D center

Here's another perspective from lee Spencer at NA__AR on FOX. It says, in part:
NASCAR allows a tolerance of 0.070 of an inch for the body off of the center line of the car. Suffice it to say, it appears Knaus pushed the limits again. But by how much? NASCAR claims it was .006 over the tolerance. That's about the thickness of two sheets of copier paper. Others in the garage hint at a charitable disposition on the part of the sanctioning body.

"You can get through inspection with quite a lot," said a crew chief who spoke on the condition of anonymity. "You can skew the grid. Back at the tech center is a whole different deal. You're busted. There's no way around it. So you just don't do it. It just seems weird that two cars from Hendrick Motorsports were questionable. If it had been me, I would have been suspended for six weeks."

But Knaus escapes with a warning.

The whole things is at: Hendrick avoids penalty despite inspection issue - NASCAR News - FOX Sports on MSN

I guess with every five or ten wins Hendrick gets another "Get Out of Jail Card?"
__________________
"If we can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people, under the pretence of taking care of them, they must become happy." -THOMAS JEFFERSON

6 days until R&R in Key West
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nebraska Men's Basketball 2009-10 Schedule Tuck4Bama Nebraska Cornhuskers 0 08-25-2009 04:54 PM
LSU Men's Basketball 2009-10 Schedule Tuck4Bama LSU Tigers 0 08-25-2009 12:57 PM
Men's Basketball - 2007-08 Schedule Tuck4Bama Nebraska Cornhuskers 0 10-19-2007 09:20 AM
LSU Men's Basketball 2007-08 Schedule Tuck4Bama LSU Tigers 0 09-28-2007 04:01 PM
Cal ranked 11th by Athlon Sports College Sports News California Golden Bears 1 05-18-2007 07:51 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:30 PM.