![]() |
| |||
| Re: yesterday in the nhl... I heard that the NHL arbitration rules - and I don't know if this is new or not - state that the arbitrator has to pick one side or the other. He either has to rule in favour of the player, or the team - he can't offer a compromise. I thought this was a bit strange. Comments? |
| ||||
| Re: Mark Recchi to Pittsburgh Penguins Quote:
|
| ||||
| Re: Mark Recchi to Pittsburgh Penguins Quote:
|
| ||||
| Re: yesterday in the nhl... Quote:
"The player and team each propose a salary for the coming season, and argue their cases at a hearing. The arbitrator, a neutral third party, then sets the player's salary. "A player can never receive less than 85 per-cent of his previous year's salary. There are no restrictions on the size of the salary awarded. A decision must be made within 48 hours of the hearing. When the decision is announced, the team has the right to decline, or "walk away" from the award. "The evidence that can be used in arbitration cases: The player's "overall performance" including statistics in all previous seasons. Injuries, illnesses and the number of games played. The player's length of service with the team and in the NHL. The player's "overall contribution" to the team's success or failure. The player's "special qualities of leadership or public appeal." The performance and salary of any player alleged to be "comparable" to the player in the dispute. Evidence that is not admissible: The salary and performance of a player who signed a contract as an unrestricted free agent. Testimonials, video and media reports. The financial state of the team. The salary cap and the state of the team's payroll." Nothing re picking a side. Which sounds fair. |
| |||
| Re: Mark Recchi to Pittsburgh Penguins Quote:
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:40 AM.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||