![]() |
| ||||
| Re: Ask The Experts ... NASCAR Quote:
that said, there are still variables in play that make a difference, like power steering, cooling (both oil and water), the particular oil being used (JGR makes it's own formulation and they claim it boosts hp by at least 2!!!), oil flow, ignition circuits (boxes, coils, distributors), wiring, special coatings (a whole new technology that's showing lots of promise), heat shielding ... each one can add or rob horsepower. if you were unlucky enough to have all the bads and none of the goods, it could seriously hurt your performance.
__________________ Press One For English "I hate 2nd .. but it's good for points" - Carl Edwards “If I had only known, I would have been a locksmith" - Albert Einstein. |
| |||
| Re: Ask The Experts ... NASCAR Racerduck, How do teams get a reading on there fuel millage and exact Miles per gallon? They say some teams will run as many laps as it take to run the fuel cell dry. Sometimes a long run at a track like lets say bristol is like 175 laps aprox. teams never run more then like 100 laps (at least not very often) so how do they get a read on there fuel millage if they dont run the tank dry or dont have time to make an entire fuel run durring practice. Is there a way to drain the fuel out of the cell and figure out how many gallons the car used durring lets say a 50 lap run at bristol, or a 10 lap run at Infinieon (sears point)? (or any track, but teams usually can do an entire fuel run at Atlanta becaues it may only be like 40-45 laps with the new smaller fuel cell. I assume maybee teams can do like a 20 lap run, have the driver pull over to the gas pumps and see how many gallons of fuel it takes to get to a full tank of gas, is this how they do it? Thanks, Michael |
| ||||
| Re: Ask The Experts ... NASCAR Quote:
__________________ No man is straitly honest to any but himself and God. - Mark Twain Forum Rules Kentucky Wildcats |
| |||
| Re: Ask The Experts ... NASCAR And some would then ask - how come they know so much and still they get surprised by either running out early, or going longer than expected? Well there's the obvious - no two "runs" are EVER the same. EVER. Even the green ones on the same track with the same number of laps. Anyones last trip to the local establishment completed at exactly the same average speed? No. Then there's the totally unfair - Cause temperature and barometric pressure cannot be predicted. Huh?! - one might say. Fill your lawn tractor/mower one evening (prior to a "hot one"). See the fuel on the floor at next days end? Quite a bit if the temperature differential was great. Expansion. Impact on calculations? You bet. Approach to race planning - "margin of error". Significant? - you bet. Is fuel consumption same at high temp/low baro as low temp/high baro - not even close. It's these "little flippin' things" that really make the race game fun/challenging/interesting. - and the very best of all - unpredictable. Gotta love it. Last edited by wingkey1 : 06-27-2007 at 04:16 PM. Reason: clarification |
| ||||
| Re: Ask The Experts ... NASCAR I remember back in the 60's when the Indy 500 was qualifying and the radio announcer (that's the only "live" coverage we got back then on non-race days) kept mentioning the temperature and the threat of rain and basically gave us a blow by blow of what the weather was doing. we all knew (of course as wingkey1 said, the weather is a big determining factor on how well the engines perform. being able to correctly guess the exact weather for a race means you're miles ahead of the competition. if you remember the rain shortened Pocono race, they showed a shot of the HMS meteorologist reading their own NWS feed and making predictions about when and where the rain would hit - the fact that they were getting real time predictions while the other teams were relying on local TV, etc. meant the Hendrick teams could make the strategic calls sooner .. the rest, as they say, is history! |
| Sponsored Links |
| |||
| Re: Ask The Experts ... NASCAR Sections 12-4-A (actions detrimental to stock car racing); 12-4-Q (car, car parts, components and/or equipment used do not conform to NASCAR rules); 20-2.1E (parts or components of the car not previously approved by NASCAR that have been installed or modified to enhance aerodynamic performance will not be permitted); and 20-2H (fenders may not be cut or altered except for wheel or tire clearance which must be approved by the Series Director) of the 2007 NASCAR rule book.
__________________ |
| ||||
| Re: Ask The Experts ... NASCAR azrael492, LSC quoted the rules cited by NASCAR that covers the infraction. what they did was interpret the rules such that wherever the template does not touch the body is a gray area and as such is allowable to "experiment". NASCAR has a large apparatus called a "template" which is the standard by which they insure that the bodies of the cars are the same. (the cars are only allowed a small fraction of an inch deviation from exactly matching the template.) unfortunately, the template is not solid, but more like a criss-cross of aluminum bars with the shape that the car has to match cut into the bottom of the template - kinda like one of those 3d graphs where the grid lines are the bars and the graph curve is the shape of the template. these bars (grid lines) are about 10-12 inches apart, so there's areas where the template doesn't touch the body; it was in one of these places that the infraction occurred. basically they "re-formed" the fender in such a way as to increase down force on the fender. increased down force means the tires have more traction, so they can go faster without loosing control. the crew chief is responsible for the car from the time it's first built until the driver gets in the seat and takes it out on the track. when the driver gets out, the crew chief resumes responsibility. tech inspection happens during the crew-chief's "watch", so the crew chief bears the brunt of the penalty when the car fails inspection, though the driver and owner are usually also penalized (it's a team thing.) I hope my attempt at explaining this along with the rules quoted enable you to get a better grasp on exactly what happened. if not, let us know and we'll try again. the last thing we want around GTG is a fan who has an unanswered question. |
| |||
| Re: Ask The Experts ... NASCAR Quote:
I believe that the rule you quote is from the "White pages" of the 2007 rule book. The COT has an entire separate section called the "yellow pages." From what John Darby (Competition Director) said Tuesday in a radio interview, I got the impression that the above rule holds true for the COT with the following addition: The templates are placed on the car at various points. There is a 1/8" tolerance. The distance between the points where the template meets the car are measured in a straight line and at no point can the body of the car intersect this line. Jeffy's and Jimmy's cars exceeded this line by approximately one inch, according to Darby. NASCAR claims the first object of the new car is safety (yawn. Where have we heard THAT before?) I believe the main object is to put an end to the body manipulation we see on the current twisted-up car, which basically looks as though it's been dropped from a few feet, before it hits the track. Darby said, (This is a quote)"In NASCAR's mind there is NO MORE GREY AREA, body-wise, in the COT. There is lot's of room for adjustment; the wing is adjustable from 0 to 16 degrees. The wing tips are fully adjustable, and the splitter has 2 inches of adjustment." I find no fault with that. In my mind, lately "Grey area," and "Innovation" has become synonymous with "Cheating."
__________________ Bob I think we ought always to entertain our opinions with some measure of doubt. I shouldn't wish people dogmatically to believe any philosophy, not even mine. Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970) |
| ||||
| Re: Ask The Experts ... NASCAR Here's my question: The "Chase" in NASCAR is relatively new and right now, I need help understanding it! I want to know what happens to the teams that DON'T make the Chase and what are they racing for if the ultimate prize is no longer available? Do they race on the same track as the Chase cars? If so, doesn't that make the larger teams with more cars have an advantage since the non-Chase cars can help the ones in the Chase? Is there a "consolation" champion award? Do the worst teams end up in Busch or ARCA next year? Thanks for your help! |
| |||
| Re: Ask The Experts ... NASCAR Quote:
I'll give you a brief answer and let the historians give you the full story. Although they cannot win the big prize they are still racing for positions 13 and on down to 50 something, depending on how many teams actually earn points. Each position pays a certain amount at the end of the year. There hope is to at the very least end up in the top 35 so that the following year they automatically get into the first 6 races. There is only one champion and that is it. Thoise who do not fair well do not go to Busch or ARCA unless that is their choice. There is much about the "Chase & Top 35" I do not like but I'll not go down that road now (again!!!) |
| ||||
| Re: Ask The Experts ... NASCAR Quote:
Gnome, Just in case you don't know, when the Chase starts, the top 12 drivers (those that make the Chase) begin with 5000 points plus 10 points for each win, then are seeded according to that point total with a tiebreaker of their pre-Chase points total. There's also an extra incentive for the 13th place, first place for those who don't make the Chase: a check for $1M at the awards banquet! |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 AM.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||