![]() |
| |||
| Scheduling Woes The 2008 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series schedule will be nearly identical to this year's slate and basically follow the same pattern of the last decade or so. But the time seems certainly right to make several changes in 2009, with SMI's acquisition of New Hampshire International Speedway a possible proponent for revisions. The Cup schedule has really been put together on more or less an ad hoc basis, taking the core template that was in place when the "Modern Era" began in 1972 and adding races as new tracks and markets came on board. The current calendar is a mish-mash of cross-country trips and several out of place stops that is grueling for teams and competitors as well as a bit mundane for many fans. While geographic and climate considerations certainly must be taken into consideration when building the schedule, competition and excitement should also come into play. The influx of 1.5-mile facilities - deemed "cookie cutters" by many disgruntled fans - brings sameness to stretches of the schedule, when it seems the series competes on these types of tracks on a nearly weekly basis. Rearranging the slate so more of a variety in tracks and racing is presented to fans should be a big part of any new scheduling process. Rather than just tweaking the circuit - shifting dates between New Hampshire, Texas and Las Vegas as has been speculated once the SMI purchase of the Loudon facility is finalized - NASCAR should once and for all take a clean sheet of paper and create a schedule that makes sense. Using several tent poles throughout the season for long-established and traditional races, such as the Daytona 500 in February, Charlotte's Coca-Cola 600 in May, the Brickyard 400 at Indianapolis in late summer and the Southern 500 at Darlington on Labor Day (which if finally moved back would be worth more in public relations value than NASCAR could imagine), the rest of the slate could be filled out. Special consideration should obviously be given to the ten race schedule "Chase" schedule, bringing the series to the best tracks and markets possible. And by shifting the season finale from Homestead-Miami Speedway to Daytona, NASCAR would have the perfect way to bookend its season at the birthplace of the sport. Ending the year where it begins would generate media exposure and fan interest that only the Daytona 500 could rival. A reinvention of the schedule would be a perfect way to jumpstart the Sprint Cup Series and bring some much-needed excitement to the circuit. What do you think?
__________________ Forum Rules Middle age is when your broad mind and narrow waist begin to change places - E. Joseph Cossman |
| |||
| Re: Scheduling Woes I am interested that you suggest The Brickyard 400 as one of the "tent pole" events. Am I mistaken in my perception that this is a relatively new race in the NASCAR calender? Or is it that the cache of holding a race at Indy is such that it has, basically, become an "instant classic"? |
| Sponsored Links |
| |||
| Re: Scheduling Woes Quote:
It was an "Instant Success" (its first year was the highest purse and additional prize money of any Cup trace that year, beating out the Daytona 500. The primary reason for it's success was that it brought stock car racing to a section of the country where auto racing has always been revered. It also brought stock cars to the ONLY track in the USA which is known throughout the entire racing world. That track is a horrible track to watch a race at. Too big and thought it was designed for stock cars (circa 1909) the track itself is ill-suited for stock car racing racing. Despite all this, the cache, as you term it, is enough to make it one of the most important races on the Cup schedule.
__________________ Bob I think we ought always to entertain our opinions with some measure of doubt. I shouldn't wish people dogmatically to believe any philosophy, not even mine. Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 PM.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||