GoTeamsGo Sports Fan Forum  

Go Back   GoTeamsGo Sports Fan Forum > NASCAR > NASCAR Forum
User Name
Password Register
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-24-2007, 08:56 AM
LSC9901's Avatar
LSC9901 LSC9901 is online now
GoTeamsGo Admin
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 17,221
NASCAR Safety

At the Dover race on 9/23 an accident occurred on pit road that involved a crew member. It was just that ... an accident. A tire got loose and was struck by a car and sent flying. It ended up hitting a crew member from the #55 team. Thankfully he had a helmet on and was not seriously injured.

With pit road, especially at Dover, being narrow what improvements, changes would you like to see implemented to keep the team members safer ???
__________________
Forum Rules

There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
- Mark Twain



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-24-2007, 09:14 AM
oncea3fan's Avatar
oncea3fan oncea3fan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: maryland
Posts: 1,140
Re: NASCAR Safety

how about dover widens pit road by moving the wall out toward the track and take up that grass strip that always get thrown up on the track and makes clean up longer.


here's a wild idea, what about a pull in back out type of pit stop.
cars would pull in to thier own "parking space" that has walls on either side that protect the crew.
or maybe a drive thru type were they don't back out but pull striaght thru toward the garage to a exit road, the crews would basically be in an island.

hey you asked!
__________________
Real Racecars Do Have Doors!,Thier Just Welded Shut!

1955 chevy vintage stockcar


It's fun to see all the fans sit down when I go by the 88.” - Kyle Busch
MEMBER OF "ROWDY NATION"
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-24-2007, 09:51 AM
Phils20's Avatar
Phils20 Phils20 is offline
MLB & Flyers Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Smyrna, DE
Posts: 4,071
Re: NASCAR Safety

I think they just need to make it 43 stalls. It was the fault of a loose tie that a car ran into, knocking it into that crew member. I guess I'm just bullheaded, but what improvements to the pits would have prevented that? And I didn't see a team get a penalty for that tire laying out in pit road either. Maybe I just missed it, since I was there, or just didn't catch it on the scanner.

But that was a scary moment. That stall was almost right in front of me, and i just saw the tire out of the corner of my eye. I didn't really see it hit him, but I knew if hit something by the way if flew up in the air.

Back to "fixing" the pit road, I would take that grass out of the front, and make it wider. That is the right thing to do, and make it longer, it is pathetic that a 1 mile track has 42 stalls, when 1/2 miles tracks find a way to get in 43!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-24-2007, 10:02 AM
NASCAR Gnome's Avatar
NASCAR Gnome NASCAR Gnome is offline
I'm not Speeding, I'm Qualifying!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dublin, CA
Posts: 661
Re: NASCAR Safety

If I were in charge of NASCAR for a day, I would make it clear to all race track owners that if they can't make the lanes wide enough and supply enough stalls for 43 cars, we will not race there, regardless of history and reputation!

Of course, this will never happen because there's too much at stake financially that an injury or two to crew is an acceptable risk to take, I guess.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-24-2007, 11:01 AM
LSC9901's Avatar
LSC9901 LSC9901 is online now
GoTeamsGo Admin
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 17,221
Re: NASCAR Safety

Quote:
Originally Posted by NASCAR Gnome View Post
If I were in charge of NASCAR for a day, I would make it clear to all race track owners that if they can't make the lanes wide enough and supply enough stalls for 43 cars, we will not race there, regardless of history and reputation!

Of course, this will never happen because there's too much at stake financially that an injury or two to crew is an acceptable risk to take, I guess.
I hear what you are saying but .... I'm looking for realistic changes that could actually be implemented. One that comes to my mind is air jacks installed in the cars like they use in the open wheel cars. That would eliminate the need for the jackman out there.

There's always the thought that you could make pit stops a minimum of 16 seconds period. Less rushing around by the crew ????
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2007, 08:13 AM
SpaceCadet SpaceCadet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oswego, NY
Posts: 604
Re: NASCAR Safety

Quote:
Originally Posted by LSC9901 View Post
One that comes to my mind is air jacks installed in the cars like they use in the open wheel cars. That would eliminate the need for the jackman out there.
This has been my thought for a long time. Is there some technical reason why these jacks can't be installed in a "stock" car? It seems like a no brainer to me, but there must be a reason I don't know of that makes it impractical/impossible to do.
__________________
If things get better with age, then I'm approaching magnificent.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2007, 08:46 AM
oncea3fan's Avatar
oncea3fan oncea3fan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: maryland
Posts: 1,140
Re: NASCAR Safety

last night on "Inside Winston Cup Racing" they said that there is supposed to be plans to change pit road at dover. they thought they should have a "short track horse racing track" on the inside to give more room.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2007, 09:27 AM
Lefturn Lefturn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 168
Re: NASCAR Safety

1. Eliminate the catch can man. Why have an extra man on pit road with his back towards the cars coming in.
2. Move the wall out at Dover eliminating the grass strip.
3. Move the inside pit wall back. There should be at least 3 driving lanes wide on pit road.
4. I agree that there should be at least 43 stalls. Perhaps they can put half on the front straight and half on the back such as at Bristol.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2007, 09:52 AM
oncea3fan's Avatar
oncea3fan oncea3fan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: maryland
Posts: 1,140
Re: NASCAR Safety

there is no room to move the pit wall back any, because of the horse track, it's very tight behind pit wall at dover. a friend has been on the fire watch crew, they give them a 1 foot square to stand in in between pit stalls, and the crews push the firemen around because it's so tight.
Tim said stewarts crew were kinda asses, but skinners crew were really cool and made sure he had cold water and evan offered food.


the catch can man is a safty deal, with out that catch can fuel spills every where and is a hugh fire hazzard. I work with a gas man about 10 years ago from Dick Trickles #64 dura lube busch car, he said that before the catch can there would be fuel everywhere, including on the pit crew, the thought of fire was always there.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2007, 10:50 AM
LSC9901's Avatar
LSC9901 LSC9901 is online now
GoTeamsGo Admin
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 17,221
Re: NASCAR Safety

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpaceCadet View Post
This has been my thought for a long time. Is there some technical reason why these jacks can't be installed in a "stock" car? It seems like a no brainer to me, but there must be a reason I don't know of that makes it impractical/impossible to do.
My understanding is that it is more about tradition than anything else. I think it's time for safety to go ahead of tradition if that is the case.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2007, 11:07 AM
Phils20's Avatar
Phils20 Phils20 is offline
MLB & Flyers Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Smyrna, DE
Posts: 4,071
Re: NASCAR Safety

Quote:
Originally Posted by LSC9901 View Post
My understanding is that it is more about tradition than anything else. I think it's time for safety to go ahead of tradition if that is the case.
I've always thought they do it for "cost savings". NASCAR likes to pretend they are old school, when in they really aren't.

I think that would be a great start. Couldn't they also make a gas can that vents itself. Part of the catch can reason is also to provide air to allow the gas to flow into the tank, at least that is what i thought.

I would like to see some of the "experts" on the networks devote some time to improvements they think can be made. I'm sure they have the knowlege, and I'm also sure there have been a few ideas shot down in the name of "tradition"
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2007, 11:14 AM
SpaceCadet SpaceCadet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oswego, NY
Posts: 604
Re: NASCAR Safety

Quote:
Originally Posted by LSC9901 View Post
My understanding is that it is more about tradition than anything else. I think it's time for safety to go ahead of tradition if that is the case.
I think it's becoming traditional to get run over in the pits. Yep, time to put tradition on the back burner, at least where safety's concerned.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2007, 03:09 PM
LSC9901's Avatar
LSC9901 LSC9901 is online now
GoTeamsGo Admin
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 17,221
Re: NASCAR Safety

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phils20 View Post
Couldn't they also make a gas can that vents itself. Part of the catch can reason is also to provide air to allow the gas to flow into the tank, at least that is what i thought.
I'm sure Ducky or Bob or another one of our resident experts can address the gas can issue but my guess is that it vents faster the way they currently do it thus allowing for a quicker pit stop. Once again if everyone had the same advantage/disadvantage in the pits then the time spent fueling or jacking up the car would be irrelevant.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 09-26-2007, 07:38 AM
oncea3fan's Avatar
oncea3fan oncea3fan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: maryland
Posts: 1,140
Re: NASCAR Safety

I believe the can itself is vented, its the air in the tank thats the problem, it can't have a large enough vent to fuel it quickly, with out being a hazzard during a crash. that vent on the back is spring loaded and opened by a rod on the catch can.

although why couldn't they change the catch can vent to be attached to the gas can and have it all in one unit, hence 1 man can do 2 jobs, leaving the other to do something else, chassis adj., clean wind shield ???
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 09-26-2007, 08:30 AM
Phils20's Avatar
Phils20 Phils20 is offline
MLB & Flyers Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Smyrna, DE
Posts: 4,071
Re: NASCAR Safety

Quote:
Originally Posted by oncea3fan View Post
I believe the can itself is vented, its the air in the tank thats the problem, it can't have a large enough vent to fuel it quickly, with out being a hazzard during a crash. that vent on the back is spring loaded and opened by a rod on the catch can.

although why couldn't they change the catch can vent to be attached to the gas can and have it all in one unit, hence 1 man can do 2 jobs, leaving the other to do something else, chassis adj., clean wind shield ???
Or just not have the other man over at all!! If it is really to be about safety, then we should be looking at cutting down the number over the wall.

But things have gotten better over time. It seems strange now to see "older" footage of members without helmets!!!

I wonder why they couldn't also have the wheels with one central hub?? Is the expense that high? Maybe a way to speed them up is the way to go, less time out on pit road, less time for the crewmen to be a target.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NASCAR History pete_b NASCAR Forum 28 11-02-2007 01:22 PM
NASCAR Ratings Slip LSC9901 NASCAR Forum 77 08-12-2007 01:50 PM
NASCAR looking into crew chief activities tkj24 NASCAR Forum 13 07-06-2007 08:49 PM
Is NASCAR Headed In The Wrong Direction ? LSC9901 NASCAR Forum 59 06-02-2007 08:15 PM
NASCAR Safety simple simon NASCAR Forum 9 05-27-2007 10:13 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:22 PM.