GoTeamsGo Sports Fan Forum  

Go Back   GoTeamsGo Sports Fan Forum > NASCAR > NASCAR Forum
User Name
Password Register
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2007, 10:22 AM
vincesanity82's Avatar
vincesanity82 vincesanity82 is offline
GoTeamsGo Super Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Nashvegas,TN
Posts: 9,834
NASCAR Partnerships, Mergers Hurt Small Teams

If this year's trend toward NASCAR partnerships and mergers has made one thing clear, it's that team owners still believe races and championships will be won by the teams with the most resources. And where do these partnerships and mergers leave smaller teams, such as Petty Enterprises and Wood Brothers/JTG Racing, or newer teams such as Hall of Fame Racing and Michael Waltrip Racing? Well, even farther behind. "Every team is going to do what they can to be competitive," defending Nextel Cup champion Jimmie Johnson said. "There is no doubt that having the fourth car out there is a benefit and is helpful. You bring in more capital, you have more resources, more people, another car on track for notes and experience and all those types of things." -- Tampa Tribune

NASCAR Partnerships, Mergers Hurt Small Teams
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2007, 10:32 AM
jks812 jks812 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 2,249
Re: NASCAR Partnerships, Mergers Hurt Small Teams

I believe it hurts the smaller teams. Like they say, the more you got the more you get. But I don't think Nascar wants the smaller teams anymore. I really believe Nascar wants as few of owners as possible.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2007, 11:45 AM
Racer Duck's Avatar
Racer Duck Racer Duck is online now
NASCAR/Motorsports Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lockhart, TX
Posts: 4,768
Re: NASCAR Partnerships, Mergers Hurt Small Teams

Quote:
Originally Posted by jks812 View Post
I believe it hurts the smaller teams. Like they say, the more you got the more you get. But I don't think Nascar wants the smaller teams anymore. I really believe Nascar wants as few of owners as possible.
they better be cautious about what they wish for .. sometimes the pet becomes a man-eater. so far the "mega" teams haven't banded together to "run" NASCAR .. but as there are fewer and fewer of them that'll change. when it does, there won't be any small teams - except as tokens.
__________________
Press One For English

"I hate 2nd .. but it's good for points" - Carl Edwards

“If I had only known, I would have been a locksmith" - Albert Einstein.



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2007, 12:01 PM
jks812 jks812 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 2,249
Re: NASCAR Partnerships, Mergers Hurt Small Teams

They think they're doing something by limiting the owners to 4 teams, but they're not. Everybody knows that Roush has 5 teams, but how many is he really listed as the owner on? Same with Hendrick, he has 4 but how many is he really listed as the owner on? No matter what Nascar calls themselves trying to do, the owners will get around it. And meanwhile, the small teams will just disappear, and thats a shame.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2007, 12:26 PM
harvick29 harvick29 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: michigan
Posts: 92
Re: NASCAR Partnerships, Mergers Hurt Small Teams

i think all the mergers happening all at once like this has a lot to do with toyota coming in to the sport.all the teams want to step it up because its only going to take time for toyota to become a force in this sport and when they do its going to be hard to keep up with their pocket book.i agree about the multiple cars being owned by one team being a problem.4 cars per team changes nothing there was allready a rule that you can only have 2 cars per owner but they have avoided that by puttin their other cars in other peoples names.with hendricks 4 cars roushs 5 cars and then the teams they both supply engines or chassis to both teams have about 10 cars each that they are a part of. thats 20 combined half of the field in a race.how does a single car team even have a chance. i always thought the best thing for the sport would be eliminate the teams all together or atleast a 2 car max period no loop holes.could you imagine the rivalrys with no teamates.every driver for themselves now that would be fun to watch.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2007, 02:18 PM
Racer Duck's Avatar
Racer Duck Racer Duck is online now
NASCAR/Motorsports Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lockhart, TX
Posts: 4,768
Re: NASCAR Partnerships, Mergers Hurt Small Teams

Quote:
Originally Posted by harvick29 View Post
i think all the mergers happening all at once like this has a lot to do with toyota coming in to the sport.all the teams want to step it up because its only going to take time for toyota to become a force in this sport and when they do its going to be hard to keep up with their pocket book.i agree about the multiple cars being owned by one team being a problem.4 cars per team changes nothing there was allready a rule that you can only have 2 cars per owner but they have avoided that by puttin their other cars in other peoples names.with hendricks 4 cars roushs 5 cars and then the teams they both supply engines or chassis to both teams have about 10 cars each that they are a part of. thats 20 combined half of the field in a race.how does a single car team even have a chance. i always thought the best thing for the sport would be eliminate the teams all together or atleast a 2 car max period no loop holes.could you imagine the rivalrys with no teamates.every driver for themselves now that would be fun to watch.
fun? yes. probable? no.

even if every team had to be independent, they would form some sort of partnership in R&D, engines, chassis, wind-tunnel, etc. so it'd just be a different way to get around the # of teams rule...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2007, 04:05 PM
bob101 bob101 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 323
Re: NASCAR Partnerships, Mergers Hurt Small Teams

How many 4 or 4+ car teams were in Nascar when Nascar decided to make 4 the maximum? Two teams?

Soon as they decided 4 was the maximum everyone went hell bent to get to 4 teams.

Mergers and big teams may hurt small teams, but let's be honest. Except on very rare ocassions - all 1-2 car teams are sideshows at the race. An owner who wants to dabble, a driver who is glad to have a ride etc...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2007, 07:42 PM
LSC9901 LSC9901 is offline
GoTeamsGo Admin
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 16,112
Re: NASCAR Partnerships, Mergers Hurt Small Teams

Multi car teams are all a part of the evolution of NASCAR. This would be the evolution that turns NASCAR into the WWF type of entertainment show versus what it started as 50 years ago.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-09-2007, 10:14 AM
King43STP King43STP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 128
Re: NASCAR Partnerships, Mergers Hurt Small Teams

Quote:
Originally Posted by jks812 View Post
They think they're doing something by limiting the owners to 4 teams, but they're not. Everybody knows that Roush has 5 teams, but how many is he really listed as the owner on? Same with Hendrick, he has 4 but how many is he really listed as the owner on? No matter what Nascar calls themselves trying to do, the owners will get around it. And meanwhile, the small teams will just disappear, and thats a shame.
At the beginning of this season Jack Roush 'owned' 2 cars, Rick Hendrick 'owned' 2 cars. There was only one team owner that 'owned' more Teresa Earnhardt with 3. If you want to see present ownership check out Jayski's® Silly Season Site. If I remember correctly, and this dates from no later than 2000, Under NASCAR rules car ownership is limited to 2 cars.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-09-2007, 10:17 AM
Racer Duck's Avatar
Racer Duck Racer Duck is online now
NASCAR/Motorsports Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lockhart, TX
Posts: 4,768
Re: NASCAR Partnerships, Mergers Hurt Small Teams

Quote:
Originally Posted by King43STP View Post
At the beginning of this season Jack Roush 'owned' 2 cars, Rick Hendrick 'owned' 2 cars. There was only one team owner that 'owned' more Teresa Earnhardt with 3. If you want to see present ownership check out Jayski's® Silly Season Site. If I remember correctly, and this dates from no later than 2000, Under NASCAR rules car ownership is limited to 2 cars.
how is that different from "team" ownership? current NASCAR rules allow 4 teams per owner (with the exception of Roush who is allowed his current 5 until 2010, I believe).
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 08-09-2007, 05:22 PM
tkj24's Avatar
tkj24 tkj24 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 540
Re: NASCAR Partnerships, Mergers Hurt Small Teams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racer Duck View Post
how is that different from "team" ownership? current NASCAR rules allow 4 teams per owner (with the exception of Roush who is allowed his current 5 until 2010, I believe).
Personally I think Roush would be better off to go to 4 teams and quit spreading his assets so thin.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 08-09-2007, 07:39 PM
Racer Duck's Avatar
Racer Duck Racer Duck is online now
NASCAR/Motorsports Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lockhart, TX
Posts: 4,768
Re: NASCAR Partnerships, Mergers Hurt Small Teams

Quote:
Originally Posted by tkj24 View Post
Personally I think Roush would be better off to go to 4 teams and quit spreading his assets so thin.
ok, if you're Roush, who do you cut? Kenseth, Biffle, Edwards, McMurray or Ragan?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 08-09-2007, 07:41 PM
tkj24's Avatar
tkj24 tkj24 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 540
Re: NASCAR Partnerships, Mergers Hurt Small Teams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racer Duck View Post
ok, if you're Roush, who do you cut? Kenseth, Biffle, Edwards, McMurray or Ragan?
Biffle they say is wanting to leave anyway. Let him go or cut Ragan. He hasn't showed me alot this year either.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 08-09-2007, 07:53 PM
Bob Tanner Bob Tanner is offline
GTG Motorsports Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 4,611
Re: NASCAR Partnerships, Mergers Hurt Small Teams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racer Duck View Post
they better be cautious about what they wish for .. sometimes the pet becomes a man-eater. so far the "mega" teams haven't banded together to "run" NASCAR .. but as there are fewer and fewer of them that'll change. when it does, there won't be any small teams - except as tokens.
BINGO!

You hit the nail right on the head.

Imagine this: Five or six team owners, with four teams each, and backing equal to that of The Fenway Group, George Gillette, Donald Trump, Bobby Ginn, Dell Webb Holdings, etc., etc. (You get the picture)

One day these teams meet and decide why should they share their fortunes with NASCAR/ISC? Why should they place themselves in positions where NASCAR, in rule infraction rulings, can rule AGAINST them? Why do they even NEED NASCAR/ISC? They have the money, the connections and the wherewithal to start their own racing series!

This is what happened to CART before Tony George made his pitiful attempt to bring good competition back to open wheel in America.

Bruton has already indicated on a number of occasions that he'd like to start his own racing series, run the way HE wants to run one. Just imagine if Bruton would have the above exampled backing...
__________________
Bob
I think we ought always to entertain our opinions with some measure of doubt. I shouldn't wish people dogmatically to believe any philosophy, not even mine. Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NASCAR Ratings Slip LSC9901 NASCAR Forum 77 08-12-2007 01:50 PM
Toyota Struggles LSC9901 NASCAR Forum 34 05-27-2007 03:26 PM
Teams trying get things past Nascar tbalt NASCAR Forum 41 02-14-2007 07:31 PM
David Gillingham oncea3fan NASCAR Forum 49 11-06-2006 09:04 AM
Those Loveable NASCAR Cup Teams Bob Tanner NASCAR Forum 5 09-15-2006 10:11 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26 AM.