![]() |
| |||
| Re: Bs! Quote:
|
| |||
| Re: Bs! Quote:
Please permit me to do a little test to either validate or not validate my theory: Let's take, for expediency, Tony's and Junior's "S-Bomb." Do the following: To yourself, say the "S-Bomb; Sh*t." Now get a mental image in your mind of what this word translates to... Now, follow the "X's" x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x OK, now say any acceptable substitute for the offensive word (Poop, Doo-doo, ca-ca, doody, #2, excremement, etc.). Now, again, get a mental image of what this words translates to. Maybe I'm just "strange," but both the "S-Bomb" and the socially-accepted word bring forth basically the same mental image. So, riddle me this, Batman, why is one acceptable and the other isn't? If they all conjure up the same basic image, then why not fine, penalize and be offended anytime any of these words pop up? I have always found this part of profanity fascinating.
__________________ Bob I think we ought always to entertain our opinions with some measure of doubt. I shouldn't wish people dogmatically to believe any philosophy, not even mine. Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970) |
| ||||
| Re: Bs! OK well let me try this approach. NASCAR has a rule about this, or at least a general rule. The rule was violated. Now lets look at this from a different word point-of-view. How about the "F"-bomb instead. There are words/terms that could also be used for that. Those too conjure up mental images. Point is that no matter the image the word was spoken and is a violation of a rule. A line must be drawn and hopefully the NASCAR mis-justice group can enforce it equally. |
| |||
| Re: Bs! Quote:
__________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0IJWN1S3Hk |
| |||
| Re: Bs! Quote:
I was just going at the thing from a philosophical standpoint, not a legalistic one. |
| ||||
| Re: Bs! Quote:
|
| |||
| Re: Bs! Quote:
|
| ||||
| Re: Bs! Quote:
|
| |||
| Re: Bs! Quote:
|
| Sponsored Links |
| |||
| Re: Bs! Quote:
Yeah, I know all about First Amendment right, but with rights come responsibilities. The responsibility here is to not intentionally say something which you are fully aware will be offensive to the majority of the people hearing your statement. It's merely a simple case of being polite and considerate. Tony was neither of these. Was I offended? No. No especially. Will civilization, as we know it, come to an end because of Tony's statement? I doubt it. Do I curse? You bet! See me smash my finger with a hammer and watch the air turn blue. Do I curse when there are people around which might be offended? I try my best not to. Tony didn't try. Usually you will find profanity is the way people express themselves when they have nothing of importance to say. |
| ||||
| Re: Bs! Quote:
If these guys want to stand around in the garage or in their motor home area and talk like that I have no issue with it. My ears are not virgin ears. I heard and said much worse but just because I do it doesn't mean I think it is OK to do it anywhere. Should I stand up in front of everyone at the Wal Mart check out and call them all A__holes ?? Even if it is just my opinion ?? It's a rules violation. Simple enough. According to your path of thinking rough driving should be OK if they want to do it. It must be OK for Chad Knaus to cheat because in his opinion it's OK. It must be or he wouldn't have done it. Same for Eury Jr and for MWR when they used an additive. Rules are rules, violations according to the rules are violations ... no matter what the perpetrator thinks |
| ||||
| Re: Bs! Quote:
it's Tony's choice whether to follow the rules or not. it's NASCAR's choice whether to keep the rule or not. one has no effect on the other. you may not know this but most Fortune 1000 companies have rules about behavior outside of work. you may say that's unfair, you may say they don't have the right, you can complain and protest all you want, but if you violate those rules you are subject to dismissal. these companies don't give a whit about what you or your friends think about their rule. if you want to work there, you'll follow the rule or find yourself on the outside looking in. it's the same with NASCAR. they don't give a whit what Tony or his fans think about their rule. Tony is only one driver, there's hundreds in NASCAR. most of the others don't have a problem with this particular rule. Tony does .. Tony breaks it .. Tony looses. someone else breaks it .. that person looses too. Tony is unremarkable in his sport. Yes, he's won some races, so have others. Yes he's won some championships, so have others. some say he's an uncontrollable bad boy. they've said that about others too. some claim he's the greatest driver ever. there have been other great drivers, some maybe better than Tony. how will he ever prove he's the best if he isn't allowed to race? This is a career decision .. Tony and you see it as a rebellion. it might be if there was a way Tony could assume control of NASCAR, but he can't. it's a closed shop. if they don't open the door, he has to practice his craft elsewhere. so it comes down to whether Tony wants to continue a promising career in NASCAR or not. it's Tony's decision, no one else's. we all hope he chooses right.
__________________ Press One For English "It may be that your sole purpose in life is simply to serve as a warning to others." - Steven Wright “If you have nothing to say, say nothing." - Mark Twain |
| |||
| Re: Bs! Quote:
|