[Quality88]

Originally Posted by Mike24

No sense of arguing. You have your opinion, I have mine.

You've learned well my friend

[LSC9901]

Originally Posted by Mike24

LSC, Helton said they aren't that smart to fix races, and most of you say the management in NASCAR isn't intelligent. So......

My BOLD quote had nothing in connection with that. He said they are working hard to protect integrity and credibility ... I say they need to work harder at it. Just an opinion.

[Mike24]

Originally Posted by LSC9901

My BOLD quote had nothing in connection with that. He said they are working hard to protect integrity and credibility ... I say they need to work harder at it. Just an opinion.

I agree they need to work harder on it. I was just pointing out something.

[LSC9901]

Originally Posted by Mike24

I agree they need to work harder on it. I was just pointing out something.

Gotcha .

[PenelopePitStop]

Well, you may consider me ignorant and/or naive. That's fine. However, I find it hard to believe that NASCAR favors ANY driver. Yes, even Gordon. In fact, I would think that NASCAR would prefer to level the playing field to attract more fans. Who doesn't love a first-time winner? Who wants to watch Gordon, or any driver, win all the time? Why bother? It's just ludicrous! NASCAR and its sponsors would not put up with this!

I have noticed that since the "debris caution" controversy, the networks make it a point to show the actual debris on the track.

conspiracy/conspiracy theory
An unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons. A theory seeking to explain a disputed case or matter as a plot by a secret group or alliance.

So how many people would it take to bring this "conspiracy" together successfully? Excuse me, but these races have national TV coverage. Who would be stupid enough to expose themselves to discovery?

This is just crazy!

There! I feel better






http://www.smileycentral.com/sig.jsp?pc=ZSzeb098&pp=ZN

[suedon70]

Originally Posted by PenelopePitStop

Well, you may consider me ignorant and/or naive. That's fine. However, I find it hard to believe that NASCAR favors ANY driver. Yes, even Gordon. In fact, I would think that NASCAR would prefer to level the playing field to attract more fans. Who doesn't love a first-time winner? Who wants to watch Gordon, or any driver, win all the time? Why bother? It's just ludicrous! NASCAR and its sponsors would not put up with this!

So how many people would it take to bring this "conspiracy" together successfully? Excuse me, but these races have national TV coverage. Who would be stupid enough to expose themselves to discovery?

This is just crazy!

There! I feel better






http://www.smileycentral.com/sig.jsp?pc=ZSzeb098&pp=ZN

THANK YOU!!!! Someone else feels the same way I do about this subject. It just blows my mind how people could honestly think there is a conspiracy in NASCAR that favors a particular driver and/or team. Like you said, there would have to be so many people involved and why would they call attention to themselves?

[Mike24]

Originally Posted by PenelopePitStop

Well, you may consider me ignorant and/or naive. That's fine. However, I find it hard to believe that NASCAR favors ANY driver. Yes, even Gordon. In fact, I would think that NASCAR would prefer to level the playing field to attract more fans. Who doesn't love a first-time winner? Who wants to watch Gordon, or any driver, win all the time? Why bother? It's just ludicrous! NASCAR and its sponsors would not put up with this!

I have noticed that since the "debris caution" controversy, the networks make it a point to show the actual debris on the track.

conspiracy/conspiracy theory
An unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons. A theory seeking to explain a disputed case or matter as a plot by a secret group or alliance.

So how many people would it take to bring this "conspiracy" together successfully? Excuse me, but these races have national TV coverage. Who would be stupid enough to expose themselves to discovery?

This is just crazy!

There! I feel better






http://www.smileycentral.com/sig.jsp?pc=ZSzeb098&pp=ZN

I may not agree with you about alot of things, but I agree 100% with this post.

[LSC9901]

Originally Posted by Mike24

I may not agree with you about alot of things, but I agree 100% with this post.

July 27, 2007 11:07 PM ... Mike and Penny agree. Is there a blue moon out there tonight ????

[Mike24]

Originally Posted by LSC9901

July 27, 2007 11:07 PM ... Mike and Penny agree. Is there a blue moon out there tonight ????

write it down in history, cause it is a rare occurrence.

[LSC9901]

Originally Posted by Mike24

write it down in history, cause it is a rare occurrence.

Exactly why I posted it !!!!

[PenelopePitStop]

Originally Posted by LSC9901

July 27, 2007 11:07 PM ... Mike and Penny agree. Is there a blue moon out there tonight ????

If everyone on GTG agreed all the time, I'd get bored very quickly. I'm not looking for a NASCAR Stepford Wives forum. There are plenty of those out there.







http://www.smileycentral.com/sig.jsp?pc=ZSzeb095&pp=ZN

[Racer Duck]

Originally Posted by PenelopePitStop

Well, you may consider me ignorant and/or naive. That's fine. However, I find it hard to believe that NASCAR favors ANY driver. Yes, even Gordon. In fact, I would think that NASCAR would prefer to level the playing field to attract more fans. Who doesn't love a first-time winner? Who wants to watch Gordon, or any driver, win all the time? Why bother? It's just ludicrous! NASCAR and its sponsors would not put up with this!

I have noticed that since the "debris caution" controversy, the networks make it a point to show the actual debris on the track.

conspiracy/conspiracy theory
An unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons. A theory seeking to explain a disputed case or matter as a plot by a secret group or alliance.

So how many people would it take to bring this "conspiracy" together successfully? Excuse me, but these races have national TV coverage. Who would be stupid enough to expose themselves to discovery?

This is just crazy!

There! I feel better






http://www.smileycentral.com/sig.jsp?pc=ZSzeb098&pp=ZN

besides, Helton admitted they weren't that smart. I believe him.

[LSC9901]

Originally Posted by Racer Duck

besides, Helton admitted they weren't that smart. I believe him.

Now we must find a degree of that admission that we agree on.

[Racer Duck]

Originally Posted by LSC9901

Now we must find a degree of that admission that we agree on.

ok .. I 100% agree with Helton. they aren't that smart. should we further define "that"?

[LSC9901]

Originally Posted by Racer Duck

ok .. I 100% agree with Helton. they aren't that smart. should we further define "that"?

I think I know what "that" is, I just don't know the degree (as in percentage) of how smart they are or from the other side of the fence ... how stupid they are.