GoTeamsGo Sports Fan Forum  

Go Back   GoTeamsGo Sports Fan Forum > NASCAR > NASCAR Forum
User Name
Password Register
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-26-2007, 09:43 AM
vincesanity82's Avatar
vincesanity82 vincesanity82 is offline
GoTeamsGo Super Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Nashvegas,TN
Posts: 9,824
NASCAR should consider franchising?

If you want to talk seriously about the future financial structure of stock-car racing, you have to talk about franchising. But how do you set it up? What about giving one franchise to each of the 20 or so team owners who are making the effort to put cars on the track every weekend? That gives an equal foundation in the sport to all the people who've committed to it. It also might help a Larry McClure or a Beth Ann Morganthau pick up a bigger sponsor who'd rather know its car will race every week than take a chance of being on the second or third or fourth car at a major team knowing it might miss races. You'd still have 23 spots for the multicar teams to fight for in qualifying.

Isn't it better, long term, for the sport to have 20 owners with a firm footing than to have six or seven four-car teams and then a bunch of cars that are never going to be competitive? Sure, an owner who has been struggling in recent years might sell his franchise to a Rick Hendrick or a Jack Roush, but NASCAR could easily limit each car owner to two "franchised" cars. At least that way, an owner could go out of the sport on his own terms with a nice check in his pocket and, in the worst-case scenario, 10 two-car teams would provide a backbone of the sport's financial future. -- Charlotte Observer

Charlotte Observer | 07/26/2007 | Inside Motorsports | David Poole
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-26-2007, 11:16 AM
Racer Duck's Avatar
Racer Duck Racer Duck is offline
NASCAR/Motorsports Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lockhart, TX
Posts: 4,766
Re: NASCAR should consider franchising?

Quote:
Originally Posted by vincesanity82 View Post
If you want to talk seriously about the future financial structure of stock-car racing, you have to talk about franchising. But how do you set it up? What about giving one franchise to each of the 20 or so team owners who are making the effort to put cars on the track every weekend? That gives an equal foundation in the sport to all the people who've committed to it. It also might help a Larry McClure or a Beth Ann Morganthau pick up a bigger sponsor who'd rather know its car will race every week than take a chance of being on the second or third or fourth car at a major team knowing it might miss races. You'd still have 23 spots for the multicar teams to fight for in qualifying.

Isn't it better, long term, for the sport to have 20 owners with a firm footing than to have six or seven four-car teams and then a bunch of cars that are never going to be competitive? Sure, an owner who has been struggling in recent years might sell his franchise to a Rick Hendrick or a Jack Roush, but NASCAR could easily limit each car owner to two "franchised" cars. At least that way, an owner could go out of the sport on his own terms with a nice check in his pocket and, in the worst-case scenario, 10 two-car teams would provide a backbone of the sport's financial future. -- Charlotte Observer

Charlotte Observer | 07/26/2007 | Inside Motorsports | David Poole
personally .. I don't think much of that idea. it only entrenches the "haves" and does nothing for a new team/owner 'cause, on top of all the other expenses with getting started, they now have to buy a franchise in addition to a license and a car number (ok, I'll grant the franchise could include a car number, but who gets to pick the number?) a franchise for McDonald's is a cool million .. other hot franchises go for at least half that! what makes anyone think that NASCAR isn't so money hungry that they wouldn't boost the cost into the upper eschelons of franchising? like a lot of these "touchy feely" ideas, it doesn't look so good when the spotlight is focused squarely on it and you get to see the "blemishes" and "cracks" clearly.
__________________
Press One For English

"I hate 2nd .. but it's good for points" - Carl Edwards

“If I had only known, I would have been a locksmith" - Albert Einstein.



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-26-2007, 06:44 PM
BringBackWilkesboro BringBackWilkesboro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bow, NH
Posts: 1,078
Send a message via AIM to BringBackWilkesboro
Re: NASCAR should consider franchising?

You may be expecting a longer post here, but instead, I'm just gonna leave a big NO.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-26-2007, 07:09 PM
simple simon's Avatar
simple simon simple simon is online now
GoTeamsGo Admin
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 11,336
Re: NASCAR should consider franchising?

NASCAR has Fox, TNT, ESPN and others fighting for TV rights

they have sponsors drooling at the chance to sponsor a race ..... sometimes it seems like every lap is brought to you by someone else

just how is it they are hurting financially ?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-26-2007, 07:12 PM
simple simon's Avatar
simple simon simple simon is online now
GoTeamsGo Admin
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 11,336
Re: NASCAR should consider franchising?

i also love the little guy having a shot ..... this totally screws them

if 20 owners lock in 40 places on the starting grid

doesnt leave much room for the Dave Marcis's of the world
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-26-2007, 07:28 PM
King43STP King43STP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 128
Re: NASCAR should consider franchising?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racer Duck View Post
personally .. I don't think much of that idea. it only entrenches the "haves" and does nothing for a new team/owner 'cause, on top of all the other expenses with getting started, they now have to buy a franchise in addition to a license and a car number (ok, I'll grant the franchise could include a car number, but who gets to pick the number?) a franchise for McDonald's is a cool million .. other hot franchises go for at least half that! what makes anyone think that NASCAR isn't so money hungry that they wouldn't boost the cost into the upper eschelons of franchising? like a lot of these "touchy feely" ideas, it doesn't look so good when the spotlight is focused squarely on it and you get to see the "blemishes" and "cracks" clearly.
Ducky hate to burst your bubble, but! Let's look at just one part of your argument, McDonalds to Nascar, no comparison. Now if you had used something like the Texas Rangers that would be a comparison. Lets just look at the top number with the top teams. 24, would most likely sell for somewhere in the 50-100 million range, due to the merchandising. Same thing for the 99, at less cost. Who else but a large group could put out all that money. NASCAR = Football = Baseball = Basketball = Hockey. All of the latter with the exception of Hockey have lost TV ratings, and fans in the stands. I hope that NASCAR doesn't start this franchising thing and maybe even get back to the old two car rule.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-27-2007, 12:13 AM
Racer Duck's Avatar
Racer Duck Racer Duck is offline
NASCAR/Motorsports Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lockhart, TX
Posts: 4,766
Re: NASCAR should consider franchising?

Quote:
Originally Posted by King43STP View Post
Ducky hate to burst your bubble, but! Let's look at just one part of your argument, McDonalds to Nascar, no comparison. Now if you had used something like the Texas Rangers that would be a comparison. Lets just look at the top number with the top teams. 24, would most likely sell for somewhere in the 50-100 million range, due to the merchandising. Same thing for the 99, at less cost. Who else but a large group could put out all that money. NASCAR = Football = Baseball = Basketball = Hockey. All of the latter with the exception of Hockey have lost TV ratings, and fans in the stands. I hope that NASCAR doesn't start this franchising thing and maybe even get back to the old two car rule.
Texas Rangers don't sell MLB franchises .. they are a franchise. McDonald's Corp. sells franchises. big difference.

just 'cause you bought the Micky D's franchise doesn't mean you have a store. it just gives you the right to put up a sign (that you have to pay for) and build a building (that has to meet the franchise's requirements), etc.

now, if you want to buy a turnkey deal, ya gotta put up lots more bucks 'cause there's cash value in brick and mortar, not to mention location and established cash flow.

no, what I'm sayin is NA$CAR can charge anything they want for the "right" to start a cup team if they start franchising. how much they will charge will be closer to a McDonald's franchise than a Surface Specialist franchise (Press Release: Low-Cost Franchise Brings High Profits to Bathroom Remodeling - Interior/Deco/Restoration | PRZOOM) .. how much the market will bear to buy an existing team (with franchise) is another matter altogether.

what do you reckon MLB would charge you to start a new team in, say OK City? it won't be $50M or even $10M. but it will be significant. doesn't mean you have a place to play or players or even a partial supply of jock straps or a bag full of worn out baseballs... that's all part of "developing" the franchise.

"franchise" is only a piece of paper that gives you the legal right to use a "protected" name to (try to) generate income. ya still have to have a product to sell.

I don't know if NA$CAR "sells" car numbers or not, but I do know they control who has what number. franchising will be akin to selling the car number to a team, but for more bucks 'cause it's called a "franchise". then with a franchising system NA$CAR could designate the minimum size of a team's shop space, make a requirement they have a "visitor viewing area" and a "NA$CAR store" at the shop. they could specify the minimum amount a sponsor would have to contribute in order to have "space" on the car as well as the specific healthcare a team had to carry for employees as well as payscales for non-critical (hourly) personnel. I'm not saying they will, but the could .. legally. something they can't do now.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-27-2007, 07:05 AM
wingkey1 wingkey1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,052
Re: NASCAR should consider franchising?

From Racer Duck post - "franchise" is only a piece of paper that gives you the legal right to use a "protected" name "


Above fired off:

One of the first thoughts had here regarding franchising is the realization that as a franchisee (the purchaser of the franchise), you are in many (most?) cases told specifically what you will cook (race), how exactly you will cook (prepare) it, from where/whom you will acquire your provisions (components), etc.

It's an "enabler" for levels of control, right up to pretty much COMPLETE control of franchise operation. Prefer here the good 'ol free enterprise, capitalist approach that has a fair amount to do with the successes in the history of our country.

Unfortunately a seemingly increasing number within our nation today have become less able to accept anything unless its' availability and presentation is completely controlled and provided to them by some "greater" worldly governing body. "Make mine vanilla please". Lemmings come to mind. I've invested in a snack shop/deli. PT Barnums is the envisioned name. Sits just before the edge of a cliff overlooking the sea. Drive through with credit or debit swipe payment only. Don't want to slow those little suckers down.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-27-2007, 10:55 AM
Bob Tanner Bob Tanner is offline
GTG Motorsports Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 4,606
Re: NASCAR should consider franchising?

NASCAR should consider franchising?

I think you made a slight mistake in your thread title, Vince. It would be more accurate to write:
NA$CAR WILL Consider Franchising

Trust me, it's a done deal by... my guess is 2010 or 2011. There will be no more one-car teams. There will be eight or nine four-car teams and four or five two or three-car teams. There will be 43 or 44 franchises awarded and that'll be it, every week. Each team will have four or five sponsors which they will spread out over the season schedule.

Same teams with the same numbers each week. Seldom will we see a change in drivers unless one of the teams has a kid in development but that'll be taken care of because Cup Lite will be a 50% mirror of Cup and the news kids will get their experience there.

The learning progress might go something like this:
(a) Kid is noticed by a "scout" in karting or running at a short track somewhere in mods, late models, or the like.
(b) Kid signs agreement with franchise and takes a step up to NASCAR East or West, ARCA, or something similar.
(c) Normal kid goes to CTS then cup lite. More talented kid might go directly to Cup Lite.
(d) Kid then languishes in Cup Lite until an opening becomes available (Example: Cup driver turns 35 and is considered too old to be really competitive and is traded to one of the franchises which is toward the bottom of the standings)

I see the possibility that the Independent Contractor" type of agreement NASCAR owner's now have with their drivers will drastically change. With the advent of franchisement, the owners would want to "own" their drivers. If that be the eventuality, then I see it very feasible for drivers and crew chiefs to be traded between franchises much like stick&ball players are now.

However it plays out I honestly believe that the DEI-Ginn merger, the Yates-Newman/Haas deal and some other business dealing have made it absolutely evident that franchising will be a fact of life in NA$CAR before we get much older.

It is my most sincere wish that one of you will convince me that I'm wrong. PLEASE!
__________________
Bob
I think we ought always to entertain our opinions with some measure of doubt. I shouldn't wish people dogmatically to believe any philosophy, not even mine. Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-27-2007, 06:19 PM
wingkey1 wingkey1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,052
Re: NASCAR should consider franchising?

NASCAR HAS ALREADYconsidered franchising.

There's an "interview transcript" with France and Helton on Jayski where France indicates familiarity with SEC rules, regs, and mentioning franchise as it relates to multi-car teams. Now one must test ones "follower" tendencies here. Those with "chicken little" syndrome will be seeing the sky falling. Then there will be the lemmings - "forward fella's, over the cliff!".

Oh shoot. 7:15 p.m. - gotta hit the road. Local track show starts in about an hour. Will get back to couch racin' later.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NASCAR History pete_b NASCAR Forum 28 11-02-2007 01:22 PM
NASCAR Ratings Slip LSC9901 NASCAR Forum 77 08-12-2007 01:50 PM
NASCAR looking into crew chief activities tkj24 NASCAR Forum 13 07-06-2007 08:49 PM
Is NASCAR Headed In The Wrong Direction ? LSC9901 NASCAR Forum 59 06-02-2007 08:15 PM
NASCAR analyst Parsons has lung cancer. indyNASCARgirl NASCAR Forum 2 07-31-2006 02:21 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 AM.