
06-05-2007, 08:59 PM
|
 | NASCAR/Motorsports Moderator | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Lancaster, Pa
Posts: 2,862
| |
| Re: Martin to sub for Jeff Gordon when baby arrives? Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike24 here we go again.... lol. Before I respond, this goes to every single driver, not just Gordon.
Now, what I find wrong with your statement is you are comparing someone getting hurt to a birth, which they are completely different. If you are hurt, yes it is uncontrollable, but it also depends on how bad the injury is. A birth on the other hand is uncontrollable, so how can you predict that? Now maybe I'm in this so called "new school" fan base, but I believe that it is wrong to punish a driver in an uncontrollable situation, such as births and getting hurt. Why should NASCAR punish a driver for not starting the race in this type of situation? That makes NASCAR look like "well, racing is more important than attending a birth of your kid, so we won't give you the points." In my opinion, that sounds totally wrong. The same thing goes with Tony in 06. He should have been at home recovering from his injury, not risking it further because he had to start to get the points. Same thing goes with Jr, and any others. But if NASCAR wants to not award Gordon the points, as of now he has a big enough points lead where he can miss a race and not lose the lead. But it wouldn't affect his Chase status as you said, since the points are based on wins. | You say it depends on badly you are injured, why should that make a difference? Either way, it was still uncontrolable and unpredictable. Just like a birth being unpredictable and uncontrolable. Nascar isn't "punishing" anybody for not taking the green flag, that's the rules and they knew them when they signed up for this profession. It's funny that throughout all the many years of racing that I've watched, this has never been blown out of proportion like it is being done with Gordo!! |