![]() |
| |||
| Nascar growth problem? Well it finally happened. Nascar has more high dollar race teams with high dollar sponsors than they have starting positions. I am very surprised this hasn't been getting alot of publicity than it has. So it seems every week this season there will be a few full time race teams with millions on the line missing races this year. My question to you guys is what do you think Nascar will do, if anything, to make it a more even playing field? Up the starting field at larger tracks? Not do anything and watch high dollar sponsors pull out of the sport? Get rid of the top 35 rule to make things more evenly? What I wish Nascar would do is drop the starting field to 40 cars. Then only take the top 40 fastest times. No gaurantees, no provisionals, no nothing. If your fast, then you are in. Sorry if you have problems during your run. You should be good enough to race your way in. I think this will make for true champions. No only will they have to worry about raceday, but the whole race weekend. It would make things more interesting. Just imagine how popular Qualifing day would become. Its ratings would be up there along with raceday. |
| |||
| Re: Nascar growth problem? Quote:
As for changing the qualifying format, I don't think that would be nescessary if NASCAR would just do away with the chosen 35 and provisionals. you have nearly 50 teams enter a race each weekend. If you leave the normall 43 spots on the line with nobody locked into anything, there would be a hell of alot of drama. Again though, I'm not positive I get your drift. |
| Sponsored Links |
| ||||
| Re: Nascar growth problem? As this line of discussion always does, out comes the cry to eliminate the "Chosen 35" I couldn't agree with this more. I hate being allowed in on past pperformance. I like Dale Jarrett but his past champion provisional has ZERO to do with MWR or Toyoter. So why does MWR or Toyoter get to take advantage of his past performance that was done with a different team ????? Race your way in or load up and go home. As for the number of racers I'm willing to listen to any number and reasons why. This way if Brian France should ask for my advice I'll have info on hand. |
| |||
| Re: Nascar growth problem? Well Ward is a prime example why the fastest should race and the slow go home. |
| |||
| Re: Nascar growth problem? I wish he would listen but I know he wont like posted in another thread I think some of ya'll do have the right answers. |
| |||
| Re: Nascar growth problem? Not sure if you are with me or not but Ward had a faster time than some of the holy 35 |
| |||
| Re: Nascar growth problem? O' I am with you Wardfan. Ward should have raced. I wish the top 35 crap had never been thought of. I didn't like it when it started and I HATE it with a Passion now. I am most definitely with you. with out question.
__________________ Troll Monkey see, monkey do, monkey can't think like you. yea I got stupid I'll never use. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:49 AM.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||