![]() |
| |||
| Re: David Gillingham I've said all along that it nothing but a practice session for the cup boys. An alternative might be to just offer more practice sessions to teams. After all the baseball, basketball, football etc, teams all practice before the big game !!! |
| ||||
| Re: David Gillingham Quote:
|
| |||
| Re: David Gillingham Quote:
But, as NA$CAR continues to try and convince the public, NA$CAR is all about fairness and everyopne competing on a "level playing field." Phhhhhhhhhhhfffffttttttttt!!!!!!
__________________ Bob I think we ought always to entertain our opinions with some measure of doubt. I shouldn't wish people dogmatically to believe any philosophy, not even mine. Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970) |
| |||
| Re: David Gillingham Quote:
NA$CAR reasoning for limiting the number of test on tracks that Cup runs on is the infamous "desire to cut costs for the teams." However, they can test on any track which Cup does not run on and I guess this creates a much lower overhead per test, eh?? For example, if they want a second test at Charlotte (approx 20 miles from the shops) no can do, but NA$CAR has no problem with them hauling the team and car up to Kentucky ( approx...? 300 miles). Yep. Sounds like a good economical rule to me. It amazes me as to how close to the government that NA$CAR comes in some of its rulings. Scarey. |
| |||
| Re: David Gillingham So you are saying that the number is basically an arbitrary number ?? The reasoning seems just short of .... well .... STUPID !!! No surprise. Does this mean that it is more economical to run a race in Busch versus a test run at some track ??? I was financially smart enough to retire at a young age but I guess I don't get the finances of NA$$$$CAR.
__________________ |
| |||
| Re: David Gillingham Quote:
Is it more economical to race Cup Lite rather than test? I see a couple of factors here. (a) You don't get paid to run tests. There is a degree of compensation for "testing" in a Cup Lite race, both from the race purse and the sponsors. (b) Often a test is run a month or more before an actual race. Running a "test" over the same weekend as the race itself gives a team a better idea of climate and affects and current track conditions. Also it is impossible to run a test in actual race conditions, where in "testing" in Cup Lite, it become reality. (c) The mega-team owners use the Cup Lite race as a real time training /practice session for their pit crew. It is probably more expensive to field a Cup Lite team and race it, but I see it as largely beneficial also, even though the cars run a different wheelbase and a lower compression engine. But then, what do I know? I, too, am often mystified by NA$CAR's concept of financial management but... Brian France is looking to buy a major league ball team and I, on the other hand, would have to give it serious thought before I bought a used Jaguar. So, they obviously know something I don't, eh? But then I am also totally mystified by the fact that so many Americans accept this Ponzi Scheme they call Social Security but that is a topic for another venue, isn't it? |
| |||
| Re: David Gillingham Quote:
Here is NASCAR's 2004 test schedule / definition: DAYTONA BEACH, Fla. -- NASCAR announced changes in testing policies for the 2004 NASCAR Nextel Cup Series, NASCAR Busch Series and NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series, increasing the number of tests available to teams at facilities hosting events on the three 2004 national series schedules. For the NASCAR Nextel Cup and the NASCAR Busch Series, the new policies allow for five two-day private-car tests and four single-day tests (14 total days); teams with Rookie of the Year candidates will be permitted seven two-day tests and five single-day tests (19 total days). Previously, teams were allowed five two-day tests while rookies were allowed nine two-day tests. For the NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series, all manufacturers will be allotted two two-day test sessions at a track of their choice, provided the track hosts a series event. In addition, each team will be allotted two private, two-day tests – thus increasing the maximum number of test days to eight. Those tests must be at a track on the series schedule, provided all series races at that track have been held. In addition: As in the past, all teams are free to test at facilities that do not host national series events, with those tests not counting toward their allotment. For the NASCAR Nextel Cup and NASCAR Busch Series, new teams or those not among the top 45 in the 2003 owner points and/or in the top 45 in the current season's owner points will receive one two-day test and one single-day test (total of three days) until they attempt to qualify for a race. Each time a qualification attempt is made, teams will receive an additional two-day/single-day allotment, up to the maximum amount. The three-day test sessions at NASCAR Preseason Thunder count as a two-day test for all teams in the NASCAR Nextel Cup and NASCAR Busch Series. NASCAR Preseason Thunder does not count against NASCAR Craftsman Truck teams' allotment. There ya go. Now, no more questions. Try to read through one time only then explain it to the next person you see. |
| |||
| Re: David Gillingham Quote:
But, but, but ...... where does the color of my car come into the mix ? Isn't that at all important ??? Geeesh !!! No wonder they have trouble following the rules. |
| ||||
| Re: David Gilliland Quote:
__________________ Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat you with experience. |
| |||
| Re: David Gilliland Quote:
He had TWO wins in 478 starts. Am I to believe he never confronted anyone ??? But wait ... he was generally the cause of most accidents !!! |
| Sponsored Links |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 PM.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||