GoTeamsGo Sports Fan Forum  

Go Back   GoTeamsGo Sports Fan Forum > NASCAR > Sprint Cup Forum
User Name
Password Register
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2006, 12:06 AM
Quality88's Avatar
Quality88 Quality88 is offline
Super Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 10,289
Re: Car of tomorrow

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Tanner
I believe that NA$CAR realizes that, whether they openly admit it or not, the absolute best racing in NASCAR at present is the CTS series. This leads me to think that NA$CAR's basic thought it to make the "stock cars" most like the trucks, as in non-aerodynamic and "boxy?"

I still think it stinks, whether it reaches NA$CAR's objective or not.
Bob, I was wonderin when you would return to this madness. Your "Na$carmobile" has been a hot topic.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2006, 10:03 AM
Nevadastars's Avatar
Nevadastars Nevadastars is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Fallon, Nv.
Posts: 2,210
Re: Car of tomorrow

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Tanner
I believe that NA$CAR realizes that, whether they openly admit it or not, the absolute best racing in NASCAR at present is the CTS series. This leads me to think that NA$CAR's basic thought it to make the "stock cars" most like the trucks, as in non-aerodynamic and "boxy?"

I still think it stinks, whether it reaches NA$CAR's objective or not.

I think they should shorten the races to the length of say, the CTS or Busch races. These Cup races have too much snoozing time with everyone cruising around in the mid-portions of the race. In the truck series, there's no time for kicking on the cruise control and keep peoples interest.
__________________
Government spending it's way out of a recession, is like an alcoholic drinking his way out of alcoholism
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2006, 10:09 AM
Bob Tanner Bob Tanner is offline
GTG Motorsports Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 6,169
Re: Car of tomorrow

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadastars
I think they should shorten the races to the length of say, the CTS or Busch races. These Cup races have too much snoozing time with everyone cruising around in the mid-portions of the race. In the truck series, there's no time for kicking on the cruise control and keep peoples interest.

How about a similiar format to the World of Outlaws? Qualifying heat races?
A semi-main and then a final main event?

Methinks that'd keep the fans on their toes, and snoozing on the couch to a minimum.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2006, 10:13 AM
Quality88's Avatar
Quality88 Quality88 is offline
Super Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 10,289
Re: Car of tomorrow

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Tanner
How about a similiar format to the World of Outlaws? Qualifying heat races?
A semi-main and then a final main event?

Methinks that'd keep the fans on their toes, and snoozing on the couch to a minimum.
Bob, you and Nevada both have excellent ideas. That would probably keep all fans on their toes. By all fans I mean those that follow the sport for other than the wrecks and the ones that just watch it for the wrecks.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2006, 12:56 PM
wingkey1 wingkey1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,175
Re: Car of tomorrow

Appears to be a number of long time fans/followers on board this thread.

Being one as well, thought I'd share a pondering I've had.

Been pondering the impact of the "foreign" powerplants. Engines of tomorrow? (EOT) "Foreign" powerplants have had much more time, $, engineering, etc. thrown in to them over the past several years (decades?) than those of domestic brand. EOT's have been engineered to really twist up into ranges of RPM that would grenade those racing NASCAR Nextel today. And they get up to those ranges in an eyeblink. Domestic manufacturers are in the financial toilet these days. Ford most obviously the latest mess.

I will watch with great interest to see if a switch to foreign powerplants occurs simply because they have the greatest odds of finishing the race. With COT removing the unique nuiances, and the inherent raciness / non-raciness of the different manufacurers body styles, folks are gonna go with the percentages in the powerplant area.

Case in point - IRL started out with normally aspirated Buicks and Chevy's I believe. What's predominant and winning there now? And the reason?

Yeah I know, I need to get over it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2006, 01:24 PM
Bob Tanner Bob Tanner is offline
GTG Motorsports Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 6,169
Re: Car of tomorrow

Quote:
Originally Posted by wingkey1
Appears to be a number of long time fans/followers on board this thread.

Being one as well, thought I'd share a pondering I've had.

Been pondering the impact of the "foreign" powerplants. Engines of tomorrow? (EOT) "Foreign" powerplants have had much more time, $, engineering, etc. thrown in to them over the past several years (decades?) than those of domestic brand. EOT's have been engineered to really twist up into ranges of RPM that would grenade those racing NASCAR Nextel today. And they get up to those ranges in an eyeblink. Domestic manufacturers are in the financial toilet these days. Ford most obviously the latest mess.

I will watch with great interest to see if a switch to foreign powerplants occurs simply because they have the greatest odds of finishing the race. With COT removing the unique nuiances, and the inherent raciness / non-raciness of the different manufacurers body styles, folks are gonna go with the percentages in the powerplant area.

Case in point - IRL started out with normally aspirated Buicks and Chevy's I believe. What's predominant and winning there now? And the reason?

Yeah I know, I need to get over it.
I, too, am a rather long time stock car racing fan. Why, I actually remember NASCAR in the BG (Before Gordon) era. I actually remember Karl Kiekhaeffer, but that's another story.

NASCAR steadfastly refuses to run anything but a push-rod engine. As I remember, and I may be wrong, but Ford tried to push NASCAR into using their OHC engine in the early 70's or late 60's but they were stonewalled and Ford ran it in the GP Series.

I heard on of the NA$CAR talking heads asked the question on a radio interview awhile back and the answer went something like: "NASCAR wants to keep the costs down and we will continue to do this by using stock normally aspirated, pushrod engines."

Oh really? You mandate hand-built, custom-made, non-stock engines, which require a battalion of engineers to tune and maintain, and NA$CAR calls this "cost-cutting?" Oh well, I guess everything is relative, eh?

BTW, I believe you'll find that IRL originally mandated Olds Aurora engines.

Yeah, I guess I should "get over it," too. But hope lives eternally in the human breast.
__________________
Bob
I think we ought always to entertain our opinions with some measure of doubt. I shouldn't wish people dogmatically to believe any philosophy, not even mine. Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2006, 02:32 PM
wingkey1 wingkey1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,175
Re: Car of tomorrow

re: Pushrod engines

Yup, yup. Forgot completely this element. Tends to limit RPM (comparably). Good point (yours) around how the claim is that maintaining the "pushrod" will put halters on price. Reality being what it is, the OHV will become (maybe already has already become) the lesser expensive.

re: Olds Aurora / IRL

Yup. I knew I was missing something. Memory bank failure. Did visit the IRL site few moments ago - featured article re: engines - the Honda engine program. The intended only for IRL.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2006, 06:03 PM
Bob Tanner Bob Tanner is offline
GTG Motorsports Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 6,169
Re: Car of tomorrow

Quote:
Originally Posted by wingkey1
re: Pushrod engines

Yup, yup. Forgot completely this element. Tends to limit RPM (comparably). Good point (yours) around how the claim is that maintaining the "pushrod" will put halters on price. Reality being what it is, the OHV will become (maybe already has already become) the lesser expensive..
Less expensive with, from what little I know about the subject, no appreciable reduction in reliability. I fear it's a matter of that old, tired reasoning; "It's the way my grand daddy did it; it's the way my daddy did it, and damn it, it's the way I'm gonna do it!"


Quote:
Originally Posted by wingkey1
re: Olds Aurora / IRL

Yup. I knew I was missing something. Memory bank failure. Did visit the IRL site few moments ago - featured article re: engines - the Honda engine program. The intended only for IRL.
You may be right. somethinmg in the back of my teflon-coated brain tells me that the IRL used stock block GM engines the initial; year then went to the Olds engine in year dux.

I knew this because, being from the Indianapolis area, I followed the breakup of the F1 Wantabe Series, a.k.a. CART, closely. I am one of the very few race fan who cheered loudly when Tony George told Roger Penske, Chip Ganassi, and the other car owners who actually wanted to run the series for their personal benefit, to go pack sand.

My American race-loving, simplisic little heart actually hoped that Tony would tell the people who wanted to run the "touch-me-and-I-break" rear-engined pieces of doo-doo to go play elsewhere and that IRL was going to run nothing but Silver Crown sprint cars in its series AND IN THE INDY 500! You know, the type cars that Troy Ruttman, Lee Wallard and Johynny Parsons won with back when Indy was a BIG race.

Yeah, I know, get over it, Tanner!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2006, 07:10 PM
wingkey1 wingkey1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,175
Re: Car of tomorrow

Bob Tanner: "You may be right. somethinmg in the back of my teflon-coated brain tells me that the IRL used stock block GM engines the initial; year then went to the Olds engine in year dux."

Look, look - neither of us is fully flat line -

IRL in 1996 & 1997 ran Ford Cosworth, Menard V8 (essentially Chevy), and Buick. A Toyota engine shows up in the race results after the first few seasons as well. As recent as 2002 - 2004 Chevy (Menard) still had an IRL "program" with some teams participating.

OK. Guess that is license for both of us to continue to dabble in memory quests.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
'Ugly' Car of Tomorrow to be tested at Michigan WVGrandma4Kasey Sprint Cup Forum 22 08-22-2006 06:14 PM
Car of tomorrow...? N2Oxide Sprint Cup Forum 8 07-13-2006 10:21 PM
Another Toyota Question Bob Tanner Sprint Cup Forum 14 06-01-2006 09:28 PM
Project Mangini: How Long Before We Win...Big! Trashed New York Jets 5 05-20-2006 08:36 PM
NASCAR Car of Tomorrow pete_b Sprint Cup Forum 50 04-11-2006 09:27 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45 AM.