[Bette]

Bad enough the Packers lost No.4, but now will they lose their home field advantage too?
Global warming could remove those icy cold days and snowstorms. An analysis has found that cold weather teams won more than 65% of their home games played from November to January against warm weather teams from 1998 through 2005.

http://www.madison.com/tct/news/276529

This is not a serious comment on global warming on my part. So it makes no difference on which side of the fence you are on about global warming.
I dont know. Maybe its a built in excuse if the Packers start struggling again.

[Seahawker 562]

Just a conincidence. Global Warming is a scam

[Bette]

Originally Posted by Seahawker 562

Just a conincidence. Global Warming is a scam

What's a coincidence Seahawker?

[Seahawker 562]

Originally Posted by Bette

What's a coincidence Seahawker?

That they happened to have better stats when in the cold

[Bette]

Originally Posted by Seahawker 562

That they happened to have better stats when in the cold

Reread the post Seahawker. It says an analysis was done that showed cold weather teams won 65% of their games in cold weather when playing warm weather teams. That means all cold weather teams, not just the Packers and it sounds like more than a coincidence to me.
Its something fans have always been aware of. It goes the other way too. Who wants to play in Arizona or Dallas in the summertime unless you are the Bucs or the Dolphins?

[Weird harold]

I don't think global warming is a scam, it's fact. And when the coastline eliminates cites, I guess the stadiums will go with them, so more home field advantage for the Packers.