![]() |
| |||||||
| |
| College Football Forum College Football Forum. Talk about everything from recruiting to the college football hall of fame. Chat about it here at the college football forum. |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| Re: Problem With The College Football Polls The problem is a bunch of homers in the media. See Simple the Left coast won't watch college football like the Midwest and Southeast. So the TV ratings and college rankings have to be tampered with. The viewership goes down dramatically for most teams when they lose. USC for example lost to an unranked opponent that single loss knocked them from #1 to the cellar of the top 10. In truth it should have put them to the back of the bus because of the competition level and conference strength. But because of the "Potential" viewing audience ESPN and others have tried to pump life back into the Trojans. The same thing happens with Ohio State. This year unless things change the SEC Champion and the Big 12 Champion will settle this controversy on the gridiron. It is totally different if you are in the situation Auburn was in a couple of years ago being undefeated and still not get a piece of the deal. I agree the system needs overhauling... they ought to implement a playoff system. The money is stopping that. |
| |||
| Re: Problem With The College Football Polls This is because the BCS uses mathmatical formulas that NASA couldn't crack! (Just kidding) Ok here it goes layman terms or at least how I would interpret it. let's take the teams names out of it. So you have the #9 beating #1. #10 beating unranked. Ok so now the next week former #9 is now number 1 because they beat the #1 team(at the time). The #10 team now beats #9 so why should they jump to #1? they only beat the 9th ranked team not the #1 team as the former #9 team did in the previous week. I know it's the same team but what matters is where they are week to week. And no I think a full fledged playoff system wouldn't work just yet in major college football. This would take away from major college football rivalaries. If you were heading into your rivalry game knowing you already are in the playoffs would you play your starters all game? Probably not. It would be like the last week or two in the NFL, which I think is a rip off to fans. They pay full ticket price they should see full rosters, but that's another argument. So you kill what makes college football so special and thats tradition. So I am in favor of the "plus 1" system. Where the BCS bowl winners play again to determine the true National Champion. |
| ||||
| Re: Problem With The College Football Polls Oh so the SEC plays 13 games including a championship goes to a bowl wins that and now has to play a 15th game? Where some divisions don't have a championship game like the Big 10, how is that fair? |
| |||
| Re: Problem With The College Football Polls Quote:
But yes it doesn't seem fair that they play an extra 1-2 games. Maybe they should take some non conferences off their schedules till the PAC-10 and Big Ten start playing championship games. (But don't hold your breath!) |
| ||||
| Re: Problem With The College Football Polls Quote:
P.S. Show me one team in the NCAA that plays 13 regular season games...you can't because there are none..the NCAA only allows 12. |
| Sponsored Links |
| |||
| Re: Problem With The College Football Polls Quote:
Also I made a mistake in my previous post when I listed teams like Arkansas and LSU playing 13 games that was because I mistakenly double counted the PPD games of theirs from earlier in the year. |
| ||||
| Re: Problem With The College Football Polls Quote:
Good find though, I had to research the answer for this...NCAA rulebook is tedious but it's in there. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 AM.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||