[Lefty Noob]

This is something I've been tossing back and forth in my head - did the San Antonio Spurs win the 2007 NBA Title, or did the Cleveland Cavaliers lose it? Were the Spurs that good that they just dominated a quality team, or were the Cavs so bad they couldn't compete with a San Antonio club that clearly wasn't playing its best basketball? I vote for the latter. What do you think?

[bears9]

Spurs won the Cavs have sucked because of how the Spurs played

[azrael492]

I'm not going to take anything away from the Spurs. The Cavs did not have any answer for Parker.

I would say they were out coached though. I don't understand a few things. Why at the end of game 3 when they needed a basket, their shooters are on the bench. LeBron had nobody to give the ball to other than Varejao?? Why did Brown not demand they stop shooting 3's. They could not hit them,but he never made them stop taking them. I would have benched somebody for a while if they could not get a three and ket firing them up without looking for another option.

[vincesanity82]

it was really lebron vs. the spurs in the finals, this isnt a great spurs team, this isnt a great dynasty, you cant compare these guys with the celtics, bulls, lakers etc..some say it was a blessing that the spurs won game 4 because no one wanted to go through another boring terrible game..and I agree, Ive never seen a lower ratings and terriblly unexcited finals before now, hopefully the nba can rebound from this, you wont see the spurs repeat thats for sure..