![]() |
| ||||
| Re: Better Off Without Vick Quote:
sure he set a record for season rushing yards by a QB, but does it matter if they dont make the playoffs ? |
| ||||
| Re: Better Off Without Vick If that doesn't do it, then how about this? Vick, before his injury, completed 57% of his passes for 81 yards and a TD; Schaub came in and completed 71% of his passes for 175 yards, 1 TD and 1 INT. Schaub also led Atlanta to more points (10 vs. 7) while he was in the game. And this was without taking snaps in practice! Vick may be the better athlete, but Schaub gives this team a better chance to win.
__________________ As of August 31, I am no longer an admin here at GoTeamsGo.com Please contact Gotham Dark Knight, LSC9901 or simple simon if you need anything. Thanks! |
| Sponsored Links |
| ||||
| Re: Better Off Without Vick seems i may be onto something Quote:
|
| |||
| Re: Better Off Without Vick Quote:
|
| ||||
| Re: Better Off Without Vick Quote:
|
| |||
| Re: Better Off Without Vick Quote:
|
| ||||
| Re: Better Off Without Vick Vick is exciting - he is also never going to take this team or any other to the Super Bowl. He has been in the league 6 years and still cannot handle an audible package. The Falcons HAVE NO AUDIBLES if you can believe that. When questioned about it Vick said they hadn't put them in yet Someone posted earlier about the teams that would jump on Vick - I say name them. Oakland possibly |
| |||
| Re: Better Off Without Vick Quote:
|
| ||||
| Re: Better Off Without Vick Let's see... Vick to Oakland for the #1 pick seems like a natural deal to me. Dolphins probably could use a QB, but they're kind of saddled with Daunte's contract right now. Houston sounds like they want to dump David Carr, so he could be a possible destination. The problem with anyone but Oakland is, do they have enough to offer in return for Vick? |
| ||||
| Re: Better Off Without Vick Quote:
Minnesota, Cleveland, Washington, Chicago (Grossman is a first rate loser, who owes his job to the defense), Detroit (Kitna's 22 picks and 63 sacks is not the answer), Tampa Bay, possibly Miami... |
| ||||
| Re: Better Off Without Vick Quote:
I hope we have all the phone numbers Seriously - all we hear is how bad our recievers are - yet they catch the balls thrown by Staub. (check the stats) No doubt Vick is fun to watch – just like a squirrel in the road – darting to and fro before magically darting to safety – problem is squirrels don’t win Super Bowls. |
| |||
| Re: Better Off Without Vick Quote:
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 PM.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||